Racist Jailed

Remember the guys on the bus who went the French tourists?

 

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/david-graham-jailed-after-video-captures-racist-tirade-at-a-french-tourist-on-a-melbourne-bus-earning-47-million-views/story-fni0fee2-1226860384273

 

A MAN who delivered a racist tirade at a French tourist on a Melbourne bus has been jailed.

David Robert Graham, 36, and Hayden Stirling Stewart, 26, were captured on video swearing at and abusing the tourist on a bus in Melbourne's southeast in November 2012.

■■■■■ Desaintjores was singing with her friends in her native tongue when Graham told her to “speak English or die” before unleashing a frightening, expletive-filled rant.

He threatened to cut Ms Desaintjores‘ breasts off with a filleting knife, telling her he was a chef and he knew what he was doing.

Graham also delivered a series of sexually degrading comments to her.

Hayden Stirling Stewart, 26, joined in the attack, and also threatened to cut the French woman.

In a different age, authorities might never have worked out who was behind the tirade, but the attack was captured on a mobile phone camera and went viral, and more than 4.7 million people viewed it across the world.

Graham, 37, who pleaded guilty to making a threat to inflict serious injury and behaving in an insulting manner in public, was jailed today for 21 days and placed on a 15-month community corrections order.

Magistrate Jennifer Goldsbrough said the rant was “overwhelmingly misogynist and sexist remarks and occasionally racist”.

She said Graham led the attack, which was unrelenting and very, very serious offending.

His lawyer, Manny Nicolosi, admitted his client behaved despicably, but said a number of factors, including his client‘s history of alcohol abuse, a train cancellation and the hot weather, influenced his behaviour.

Stewart pleaded guilty to making a threat to inflict serious injury, behaving in an insulting manner in public and intentionally damaging a bus window, which he broke with his arm, causing glass to fall onto Ms Desaintjores and cut her.

Ms Goldsbrough noted Stewart, who had already served 63 days in custody, suffered a major depressive illness and played a much lesser role in the attack than Graham.

She sentenced Stewart, who has a long criminal history, to time already served and a community-based order that includes 150 hours of community service.

— AAP

Bruddy lacists.

Booooooooooooo.

Not Bolt.

Racial discrimination: groups unite against ‘morally repugnant‘ law changes

Community organisations say Coalition‘s proposed amendments will allow the public humiliation of people because of their race

 The Coalition vowed to repeal section 18C of the Act after the federal court found that conservative journalist Andrew Bolt, above, was in breach by publishing articles questioning the motives of fair-skinned people who identified as Aboriginal. Photograph: Julian Smith/AAP

Community groups have warned the Abbott government against pursuing “morally repugnant” changes to racial discrimination laws, arguing Australia‘s national interests are being sacrificed to score points in the “culture wars”.

 

In a blistering joint statement issued on Tuesday, representatives of the Indigenous, Greek, Jewish, Chinese, Arab, Armenian and Korean communities vowed to step up their campaign against amendments that would “license the public humiliation of people because of their race”.

Tony Abbott promised before the election to amend the Racial Discrimination Act in the interests of upholding free speech.

 

Unhappy with a 2011 federal court ruling about articles by the conservative commentator Andrew Bolt, the Coalition vowed to repeal section 18C in its current form. The section makes it unlawful to “offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate” a person or group because of their “race, colour or national or ethnic origin”.

 

Fresh speculation about the extent of changes has triggered a joint statement by community leaders expressing their “vehement opposition”.

The letter – signed by the National Congress of Australia‘s First Peoples, the Armenian National Committee of Australia, the Arab Council Australia, the Chinese Australian Services Society, the Korean Society of Sydney, the Australian Hellenic Council, the Chinese Australian Forum and the Executive Council of Australian Jewry – urged the government against removing the words “offend, insult, humiliate” from section 18C.

 

They also reacted angrily to a report in The Australian newspaper suggesting the government was looking at removing the requirement that a defendant must have acted “reasonably and in good faith” to be eligible for an exemption under another section of the same law.

“It would send a signal that people may spout racist abuse in public, no matter how unreasonably and dishonestly,” Peter Wertheim, the executive director of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said in the statement.

 

“It would be astonishing if an Australian government in the 21st century was prepared to embrace such a morally repugnant position. It would be utterly indefensible. The suggestion that section 18D [relating to the exemptions] might be amended by deleting the threshold of reasonableness and good faith comes as an especially unpleasant surprise to us.”

 

A federal court judge in 2011 found that Bolt breached 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act by publishing newspaper articles that questioned the motivations of fair-skinned people who identified as Aboriginal.

 

According to the federal court‘s ruling, the conduct was not covered by the section 18D exemption for making fair comment in good faith, because the articles “contained errors of fact, distortions of the truth and inflammatory and provocative language”.

 

Wertheim said the Racial Discrimination Act ought not be changed unless there were “truly compelling reasons” and the outcome of one contentious case – the one involving Bolt – fell “a long way short in that regard”.

 

“Australia‘s long-term national interests in maintaining a harmonious society and the respect of neighbouring countries are being sacrificed on the altar of political expediency in order to score points in the so-called ‘culture wars‘,” he said.

 

“It will leave a lasting stain on the legacy of the present government if they proceed with this.”

 

Wertheim said the law only applied to serious cases and went beyond “hurt feelings”. It enabled targeted groups to defend themselves against racial vilification and had “nothing to do with limiting free speech”, he said.

 

“The law does not stop anybody from offending, insulting or humiliating others because of their conduct, opinions or beliefs,” Wertheim said.

 

“People can change their conduct, opinions or beliefs. But the current law does prohibit publicly offending, insulting or humiliating others because of their race, which is something people cannot change. Offending, insulting or humiliating other people because of their race is not about persuasion. It‘s about attacking their human dignity.”

 

A spokesman for the attorney general, George Brandis, said the government would not comment on the wording of proposed amendments to meet the objectives of reforming the Racial Discrimination Act.

 

But he has previously defended the government‘s plans and said he had met with many stakeholders, community groups and interested individuals as part of community consultation.

 

“What Mr Abbott and I have said since the election about section 18C is precisely, word-for-word, what we said before the election and that is that we would repeal section 18C in its current form, that we would remove from the Racial Discrimination Act the anti-free speech provisions, which enabled, for example, the journalist Andrew Bolt to be taken to court merely because he expressed an opinion about a matter of public policy which was offensive to some,” Brandis said.

 

“What we promised to do was to rewrite the law by repealing section 18C in its current form so that it is no longer an impediment to, or a chill factor, upon freedom of speech and that‘s what we‘re going to do.”

 

Brandis has faced pressure from the Institute of Public Affairs, a think-tank with strong Liberal party links, to repeal section 18C in its entirety.

The director of development and communications at the Institute of Public Affairs, James Paterson, said last week that the entire section 18C was an “excessive limitation on freedom of speech” and should be repealed to keep the spirit of the election promise.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/18/racial-discrimination-groups-unite-against-morally-repugnant-law-changes

Now, if the bloke on the bus had only hung out a little longer, he could have racially abused that vulnerable French girl for as long as he wanted without repercussion.

 

Clearly been let down by the coalition on this one.

Almost as disgraceful as the racist outburst from those two arseholes is that a bus load of people sat there and did nothing.

Ridiculous that people go to prison for speech. It doesn't solve racism, it just makes the racists keep it to themselves. It won't stop people using a position of power to hurt other races etc.

 

I want to know who the racists are, so I can engage with them and put them in there place with intellectual speech.

 

Let me use America and African Americans for example.

 

Racist: "Damn blacks, sucking us dry on welfare"

Rational Person: "Well actually statistics show most of the people on welfare are white"

Almost as disgraceful as the racist outburst from those two arseholes is that a bus load of people sat there and did nothing.

Spot on, not a single person stood up for that person. Just as spineless as the racist twat.

Ridiculous that people go to prison for speech. It doesn't solve racism, it just makes the racists keep it to themselves. It won't stop people using a position of power to hurt other races etc.

 

I want to know who the racists are, so I can engage with them and put them in there place with intellectual speech.

 

Let me use America and African Americans for example.

 

Racist: "Damn blacks, sucking us dry on welfare"

Rational Person: "Well actually statistics show most of the people on welfare are white"

Almost as disgraceful as the racist outburst from those two arseholes is that a bus load of people sat there and did nothing.

Spot on, not a single person stood up for that person. Just as spineless as the racist ****.

You should note what the judge said again. Wasn't for only the one thing...

 

Magistrate Jennifer Goldsbrough said the rant was “overwhelmingly misogynist and sexist remarks and occasionally racist”.

 

I'm also not sure that fighting back is something they teach you as a way to stop this sort of thing. If it was then police would probably use it...

THREAD LOCKED.

It started well and rapidly went downhill. Closing this before a lot of people end up on holidays.