Also thanks for the reminder to update this:
10 Likes
Lav point.
66-98
Would almost pefer losing from the begining then dropping a 20 point lead and then lose.
What a shitful performance
hind not ripped out of marking contest. play on
1 Like
Boyse nice pack mark. And goal.
72-98
1 Like
In the end, I think the match is going to be decided by:
- About 3-4 goals given up by clangers in our D50.
- No McKernanâŚand Strachan/Draper couldnât fill the marking role up forward.
Which one of the boys got it?
Clarke two kicks forward gets to Mutch, pushed in back. Free, goal.
78-98
Berzerker will end up the best of the lot and Iâd be throwing him into the mix next week
10 Likes
Wasnât Drapper a soccer player? why didnât the club draft a footballer?
You have to love his aggression and repeat efforts.
They have a bunch more mature bodies than us. Guys like Fasolo, Mayne, Wells, etc against our younger guys. (We have 3+ vfl debutants + Francis and Long only half games). Result not ideal, but not a great concern to me. Put McKernan/McNiece/Merrett/Redman in and we probably win. (Would have been 35 up at quarter time)
4 Likes
Whereâs he been playing Ace?
78-99
disposal numbers will look good for the usual suspects looking at promotion
never mind the decision making and skill execution is average and doesnât look like improving anytime soon.
1 Like
The team was up by 19 no excuses to drop off like we did imo.
Losses should not be accpetd itâs why have been â â â â for so long.
Backs himself and just seems to know whatâs going on. Looks a gem.
1 Like
Good physical hitouts for Mutch and Laverde on the return from injury.
Langford has been far better than some of you morons like to paint.
Good signs from Zerk and Clarke. 1st hitout for Francis.
Big picture.
14 Likes
You reckon that Collingwood didnât start to control the stoppages, force an inside scrubby game, force it into a battle of strength and then get on top as our less mature bodies tired??
2 Likes
Collingwood is first to 100.
Damn.