Then your definition of faith isn’t my definition of faith.
I.e. what I talk about when I mean faith are exactly those things.
Another example of faith is that your spouse loves you. You cannot scientifically test it - but you have evidence for it. And hence the reason it’s called ‘faithfulness’.
The only ‘proof’ that technically exists (that I’m aware of) is a mathematical or logical proof.
Certainly science doesn’t claim to offer proof. I.e. it doesn’t “prove” climate change is real - every theory can be falsified (or we can’t do science). There’s just a mountain of evidence for it. And thus we have a high amount of confidence it is true.
Science proves a great many things.
It proves that when you push something resting on a table it will fall to the ground.
There are equations that will show you the rate at which it will fall and so on and so forth.
And yes, a ‘theory’ ‘can’ be proven false. And then you’ll have a new theory based on observations of the new information.
But that new theory will still not be ‘God did it, I guess. I mean, we can’t really know anything. May as well give up. No more trying to improve things. No more trying to cure or prevent disease, because shrugs we can’t actually know it works.’
You’re being very silly.
Edit: Wow, so that was tactless. I didn’t see your last post. i apologise.
Actually the point was that the onus is on people who make a claim that things are a certain way, or that a certain thing exists, to provide evidence for it.
You can apply that to God, if you like, but it’s an example, not the argument.
The point is Tippa is god.
Sisco Sodoro did not have faith.
Then he got blind on the way to Damo’s house, and yea, he saw the light.
Thus he drafted Tippa, and donned a jacket, and became Disco Dodoro, and spread the word of our lord, Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti