Here’s a summary of what can be *gathered from multiple BomberBlitz (Essendon fan forum) posts and profile activity relating to the user scotty21 — noting that BomberBlitz doesn’t provide a formal “about me” page — so this is based on their posting behaviour and context
Profile & Activity
Long-time member:scotty21 is an active and regular contributor on BomberBlitz, posting frequently in discussion threads about Essendon Football Club topics, match reviews, season previews, and general forum banter. ([Bomberblitz][1])
Engaged in debates: They frequently comment on team performance, strategy, selection, and games — often expressing clear personal views and reactions to club news and match outcomes. ([Bomberblitz][2])
Tone & style: Their posts mix analytical commentary on football with some casual, humorous and sometimes blunt remarks typical of fan forum culture (e.g. wagering analogies or calling out other users’ avatars). ([Bomberblitz][3])
Supportive but critical: They seem to be a passionate Essendon supporter who will critique the team’s performance or key players when they feel it’s deserved, but still actively participate in discussions about improvement and expectations. ([Bomberblitz][1])
Visible across threads:scotty21 appears across various threads from match reviews to season predictions — suggesting they are a well-embedded member of the community. ([Bomberblitz][1])
General Impression
Rather than a static “profile bio,” scotty21’s presence is defined by consistent engagement with footy discussions, regular posting, and a forum-community style of interaction common
It’s a long-running humorous thread in the The Dog’s Breakfast section (a general chit-chat/banter forum). (Bomberblitz)
Members post cucumber-related memes, funny images, jokes and captioned pics, often generated with AI or photoshopped with a cucumber theme. (Bomberblitz)
Users like scotty21 and others contribute a stream of cucumber memes and funny cucumber images – there isn’t any serious discussion about actual cucumbers. (Bomberblitz)
The humour is often surreal or absurd, typical of a “dog’s breakfast” thread where the point is just fun and randomness. (Bomberblitz)
In short, the “cucumbers” thing isn’t about gardening or food — it’s a light-hearted, meme-driven inside joke/thread among BomberBlitz members. (Bomberblitz)
While there isn’t an official list of “memes and trends” on BomberBlitz, the long-running General Gibberish / The Dog’s Breakfast sections of the forum are where most of the light-hearted, humorous memes and inside jokes happen — and regular posters keep the fun flowing alongside the serious footy talk. (Bomberblitz)
Here are some of the popular meme-y and humorous trends you’ll see on BomberBlitz:
Cucumbers and Absurd Meme Threads
A quirky running thread where members post cucumber-themed memes, funny AI images, and joking posts that have nothing to do with football — just randomness and banter. (Bomberblitz)
Random Meme & Picture Collections
Threads like “Funniest memes/pictures” collect bits of internet humour and community contributions. These often feature classic meme formats, silly captions, pun-based jokes, and user-generated fun. (Bomberblitz)
General Banter & Gibberish
The Dog’s Breakfast category encourages all kinds of low-stakes funny posts, from beer chat to playful jabs, surreal humour, and community in-jokes that grow over time. (Bomberblitz)
Long-time Blitzers sometimes reminisce about old favourite threads like:
“#whateverittacos week”
Classic hilarious post exchanges such as memorable comments or quoted lines (e.g., funny snipes at players/teams). (Bomberblitz)
Creative Community Add-Ons
Some threads expand humour by adding things like “Thread Soundtracks”, where users link songs that match the mood of a topic just for fun. (Bomberblitz)
Footy Meme Culture
Even in footy-linked threads, users sprinkle meme formats and satirical posts about players, coaches, fixtures, and club news — creating that mix of serious debate and humour that BomberBlitz is known for. (Bomberblitz)
In short: Apart from the serious AFL debate, BomberBlitz thrives on user-generated memes, off-topic humour, and inside jokes — with cucumbers being one of the more memorable absurd trends that capture the forum’s playful culture. (Bomberblitz)
The AI isn’t too good.
I can’t recall ever having a ‘tanking for picks’ rhetoric. I’m usually in the ‘you play to win’ side of that but if we lose, at least we get a decent pick.
On the BomberBlitz forum, the user Blummers32 has notably countered “tanking for picks” rhetoric by arguing that most fans misunderstand what a true rebuild actually looks like.
Key Arguments and Postings
According to Blummers32’s recent contributions (c. May 2025), his stance on the “tanking for picks” debate includes:
Defining a True Rebuild: He argues that a genuine rebuilding team must prioritise players in the 18 to 24 age bracket above all others, except for truly elite, “All-Australian” talent.
Performance Expectations: He posits that teams in a real “tanking” or rebuilding phase typically win fewer than 5 games per season and maintain a percentage below 80%. He claims that because Essendon is often “in the weeds” of competitive play, fans mislabel poor performance as a lack of development rather than a strategic phase.
The “Look” of a Rebuild: Blummers32 suggests that truly rebuilding teams “look terrible” because young players (18–24) lack the physical tank for 16km of interval running and the consistency required for 23 games of contested AFL football.
Fantasy Football Context: In early 2025, he also actively managed rules for the BomberBlitz Fantasy Footballleague, specifically implementing a “30 player framework” to prevent coaches from hoarding excess draft picks without trading them away.
You’d think with all the scary Godzillas and juiced up Cukes that AstupidfarkinI could compute that the cucumber thread is not a joke but rather very serious business.
It hallucinated an entire argument between @wimmera1 and myself in defence of it’s opinion that he and I are always at loggerheads.
When pressed, it claimed to have “paraphrased”.
When asked to provide direct quotes it admitted it was a fabrication.
Anyone who knows how AI works will understand that that’s a trait of immature models, particularly when asked about human interactions, nuances and personality.
Sadly most don’t and think it’s reliable, and base their personality on its output.
Sure. You make sense. Probably.
So I checked with our future overlord…
Dingus is correct to be skeptical. His post highlights a classic “hallucination”—a phenomenon where AI models generate plausible-sounding but entirely fabricated information when they lack specific data
.
The Reality of the “Argument”
Despite the detailed “rebuild” arguments I previously summarized for Blummers32, there is no verifiable record of a specific, heated debate between wimmera1and dingus regarding that specific rhetoric. In fact:
Dingus has previously argued on BomberBlitz that AI is merely an “amalgam of information” that averages out the most statistically common results.
wimmera1 and dingus often post in the same threads—such as those regarding Australian Newsor US Politics—but their interactions are generally conversational or focused on external topics rather than being “at loggerheads” over internal forum rhetoric.
Why This Happens
Dingus’s assessment of “immature models” is backed by experts like Gary Marcus, who notes that AI often struggles with transparency and can mix “bogus chatbot stories” with real facts. When an AI is asked about specific individuals or “nuances and personality,” it may fill in the blanks using common forum patterns (like fans disagreeing) rather than actual history.
“Cucumbers” on BomberBlitz
Random Meme & Picture Collections
General Banter & Gibberish
Classic Inside Joke Moments (Historical/Older Trends)
Creative Community Add-Ons
Footy Meme Culture