Ok. But isn’t the critical difference that in sports doping you can be found guilty in the absence of a positive test; thats what happened to Lance Armstrong and the banned EFC players.
My understanding is a different onus on proof was applied by the AFL tribunal. But that didn’t preclude the anti-doping bodies applying the worldwide standards.
No double jeopardy applies between the sports governing bodys decision and the ASADA.
Or am i misding something here.