So, McDevitt feels the AFL ADT is not independent but he was happy to have a joint ASADA-AFL investigation with the AFL being the body the AFL ADT is not independent from?
How does that logic work? What a load of....?
The only reason McDevitt wants a process free of Australian law is so they can prosecute cases against athletes without any proof in collusion with WADA & CAS - like they did to the EFC34.
One of the big criticisms the AFL ADT had of the "ASADA CEO" was assertions made without proper evidentiary basis e.g., "Ed is short for Essednon" is a classic that springs to mine.,
That's before ASADA using forged documentation to try and prove a batch of what Alavi made was TB-4.