The tricky bit for Tassie won’t be finding clubs eager to trade for those picks, it’ll be convincing the established quality players that they need to join them.
They’ll have a massive wheelbarrow full of money to chuck around which will certainly help, but most established clubs have a pretty good pipeline of ways to ensure their players are financially taken care of, ranging from Cotton On franchises to Welsh and dodoro’s property development schemes.
I could very easily see a scenario where a few late-career middling players make absolute bank off Tassie’s concessions because the big names and big talents all knocked the offer back, while the side spends years being crap and destroying young players by overworking them too early.
If Parish can get on the park at some point, he might be a mature body that they might overpay for in terms of slinging us a decent draft pick. That’d be a good outcome.
It is really dumb strategy. If we load up this year and next we could be at a big competitive advantage when all the compromised drafts come through in a few years. Instead we’re wanting to burn picks on guys like Sam Flanders, brayden fiorini and retain Zac Merrett.
I’m no expert but with Tassie having the picks they’re going to have and us being likely at the pointy end of the draft for the next couple of years, isn’t it a competitive advantage if we tried to get into any and all first round picks in that draft and make it virtually a two horse race by locking other clubs out of as much of the first round as possible? I know it’s a hot take, but is it strategically a terrible idea?
Does kind of look and sound like that. Flanders, sure I guess. But otherwise retaining and then getting in 2 blokes who won’t be in the next competitive side we put out there is very stinky. Early days, due diligence etc. Fiorini might be a good leader type, meh.