The Cricket Thread (part 10) - from Feb 2025

The history of childhood prodigies in Indian cricket means he’ll either:

(1) Be an all-time great batsman, one that we talk about in 40 years as in the conversation of greatest to have played.

(2) He plays about 6 international games before being dropped and never heard of again.

There is no inbetween.

5 Likes

^^ THIS ^^

Which beckons… the Sachin Teundulkar pathway, or the Prithvi Shaw pathway?..

1 Like

Would a 14y.o. be allowed to play first class cricket in Australia?

Doesn’t feel quite right to me. Main concern being exposure to the fastest bowlers going around.

He faces Jofra Archer in the nets for Rajastan and pumps him all over the place. Reckon he’d be pretty comfortable handling Nathan McAndrew and Jackson Bird…

He’s gone out and scored the 2nd fastest IPL hundred of all time in only his 3rd match. He’s not your average 14y/o kid.

3 Likes

Yeah, if you are good enough you can play at any age. I’ve seen some decent 14-15 year olds play Premier cricket here but for one reason or another they often don’t progress through the ranks. Many tend to go back or continue down the football pathway

3 Likes

A lot more opportunities to become an average AFL plodder on $300k than there are at the commensurate salary level in franchise cricket. What are we talking, probably ~500 afl footballers on ~$250-300k/year?

There wouldn’t be more than ~50 cricketers in Aus earning that. All the nationally contracted players and the top few players at each state/bbl franchise?

2 Likes

In other news, Ferg is leading the County Championship wickets tally after the first month of the season and that’s his stint done.

4 Likes

Rohit has retired from test cricket. So after dropping himself for the Sydney test he never played again in the format. Probably not surprising really. The writing was on the wall at that point.

1 Like

Looks like Marnus gonna pushed up to open for the WTC Final, to help with the selection squeeze re: Green/Webster. So Konstas will miss out again and Marnus/Smith shuffle up a spot to opener and #3. Green to #4.

Still chat that Green is going to 3 and Smith 4

1 Like

I’d prefer Green 3, Smith 4.

But shoehorning Marnus in as an opener? Not a fan of that.

I really wish they’d stop kicking the can down the road and address the opener issue now, rather than when we need to replace two when Usi leaves as well.

I know Konstas hasn’t had great form in the shield but he was the incumbant, excluding the horses for courses strategy with Head.

Perhaps this sneaks us the Test Final, but it delivers the Tsatas treatment onto Konstas and robs him of one Test match, one Test match which probably delivers the equivalent of 10 Test matches of experience if you go by Sheedy’s rule re: big matches and youngsters.

Konstas isn’t getting any greater benefit of experience from the WTC Final than he was from facing the best bowler in the world in the form of his life last summer.

Bottom line, they picked him when he arguably wasn’t ready but purely to throw off the Indian’s and Bumrah who we had seemingly no answers to, in the last 2 tests of a series that we haven’t won in a decade. It worked, he rattled India for the briefest of moments and it gave us the the ascendancy in the series. But his defensive deficiencies were quickly exposed, so sending him back to first class cricket to develop and learn his game isn’t a bad idea.

Is Marnus at opener a long term strategy? Probably not.
Is it McSweeney? Maybe, but probably not.
Does Konstas need more time to learn and trust his game? Most definitely.

Expect more stop gap solutions for the coming summer as well and perhaps Konstas finds his way back into the side if things go really pear shaped and we need a circuit breaker.

1 Like

I think this is just a one off test stop gap and everything I’m hearing suggests we will treat the Windies series differently and go in with a recognised opener

1 Like

ā€œrecognisedā€ but in what capacity?

Given what the wickets are likely to be over there, could well end up being Trav to open again.

It’d be a good opportunity to have another look at Konstas or McSweeney given the relative quality of the opposition, but really it’s not gonna give us much of a look at next summer let alone the longer term future.

Unlikely I know but if Marnus shot the lights out in the WTC final as an opener, then I could see them keeping him there indefinitely to avoid making any hard calls for a little while. Usman should be done at the end of the Ashes so it would avoid us having two essentially new test openers after this summer.

At this stage Trav hasn’t been ā€œaskedā€ to open over there and both Trav and Carey think that the selectors are leaning towards Konstas but McSweeney is in the mix and I guess if Marnus bats well in the WTC they may keep him there but I think that’s less likely

1 Like

I’m imagining they’ll want 2x quicks, 2x spinners, +Webster?

When is it expected that Green will be cleared to bowl again? He’d be ready by the Ashes yeah?

If Webster can kick on from here it’d be a great result though cos it’d further ease any reliance on Green to contribute much with the ball and allow him to focus on being an out and out batsman. I imagine that’s the way things are tracking anyhow even putting Webster aside.

It’d be handy to have him up your sleeve as a partnership breaker though who can send down a few overs an innings when needed.