oh well I guess they’ll be going home tomorrow now accusing us of cheating
1 Like
Geez it’s so bloody obvious.
How does an umpire miss that on field.
How the ■■■■ is that guy still umpiring
amount of noise about aussies not walking would’ve been immense
Robbery attempt FAILED lets ■■■■■■■ go
1 Like
lmao, you would all be saying the opposite thing if that was an Australian batsmen.
That shouldnt have been given out.
1 Like
Fark off Tim Lane. Sanctimonious git.
7 Likes
Time this ■■■■ out too.
He would have known he hit it.
It was clear as day it was out and if you rely on snicko for the decision only then you ignore what was obvious.
2 Likes
It clearly deflected.
You must be high
1 Like
it kind of hit the bat on the swing you can see the deviation but I can see why snicko wouldnt have registered
1 Like
What’s the idiot saying? Does he have eyes?
1 Like
He refused to go ……EAD India you cry babies
Clearly there was minimal noise.
As if he has more credibility than Ponting
What a tosser
1 Like
They use snicko for those decisions in every other case.
India in deep ■■■■■ 7/140 and we still have the new ball to come. Akash in.
Isn’t he a FCFC supporter?
I reckon it came off the bat.
1 Like
Of course he is.
1 Like
Anyone thinking that didn’t deflect must also think Tom Hawkins didn’t hit the post in the 2009 GF