Lee - N Craig
CGates - McKenna
Karmabomber - D Smith.
Any other hatreds rival these three?
Lee - N Craig
CGates - McKenna
Karmabomber - D Smith.
Any other hatreds rival these three?
I think having a trawl through the Langford thread will reveal a few peopsā¦
And @Cgates are we talking Conor or the other Guy?
Blitz - Stanton???
The coach
Thank the maker.
When I first read it I thought it was Conor and my only conclusion was that cgates must be a northern Ireland Protestant
Out: Cranky new Karma
In: Happy old Karma + expenses
My wifeās removing my cranky pills from this weekend!
Just go treat yourself to a D850 or D500 , Karma.
#Happiness
#WifeMightDisagree
I donāt know the specifics of what needs to happen list wise, ie what changes happen to the rookie list but my thoughts are:
Gone: Jobe, Kelly, Stanton, Hocking, Eades
On thin ice: J Merrett, Morgan, McKernan, Long
In: Stringer, Saad, Smith, Lavender
Assuming we require 3 picks at the draft and the adjustment in the rookie list requires we need X amount of lost spots, I think theyāll come from the above players.
I think McKernan is particularly unlucky but with the cat B rookie and Draper also around in addition to Leuenberger & Bellchambers, I think heās without a spot if heās not a back up ruck unless the list management team see him as a KPF which I donāt think they do given how heās been used in past seasons.
Given the acquisition of Saad this trade period and McGrath plus the development of McKenna, Mutch, Clarke etc I really donāt see what purpose is served by keeping Morgan and J Merrett. Tough calls but IMO they are too far down the depth chart & tough calls need to be made. Ditto Long. Think heās done his time on the rookie list so itās either upgrade or delist? Happy to be corrected on that.
I think Bird, Howlett & Green will survive for depth.
Iād rather keep jerrett than howlett tbh but really, both should go
Iād delist Jerrett and Howlett.
Jerrett: hasnāt cracked the team all year. I donāt recall him in the emergencies too often either.
Howlett: I actually like him (he has heart), but considering since the start of the year Begleyās gone past him, and weāve recruited Smith, I just see him as being surplus to requirements.
I think Smack is safe. Heās only on the rookie list. Draperās still learning the game and has had to get over foot problems of his own. Our rucks are fragile. And Lavender hasnāt even shown he can play VFL, let alone AFL. So essentially heās holding no-one back and is good insurance.
Morgan is still young - but has to lift his game.
Long is on thin ice - but he was always more of a longer-term prospect. Hopefully he can turn the corner this year.
Bird - only stays because I think Jerrett and Howlett are on the blocks in front of him. At least he has experience (and weāve lost some in the mid-field).
Not sure if this has been mentioned elsewhere but one thing I found very interesting in Scooterās podcast with Rob Kerr was that Kerr mentioned one big point of discussion in the most recent list management meeting was whether theyād have 38, 39 or 40 players on the main list.
If they plan to go with 38 that makes it interesting. Weāve currently got 39 on the main list. We have to add 3 through the draft or rookie promotions, which means weād have to delist 4 to end up with 38. That would mean Jerrett, Howlett, Morgan and Bird all gone.
Of course he didnāt say what the end decision was, so they might still be looking at 40.
Where is the podcast?
The thread called Saturday lunchtime catchup or whatever it isā¦
Iād link it but iām on my phone.
Hmmmā¦ I hope he doesnāt mean the early Jobe. That model was fat and lazy.
Lavender is a bonus Rookie B.
Doesnāt count as an āinā.
We can have up to 3 of these - So McNiece, Lavender, and another.
Jerrett should be gone, but there is talk of a one year contract for Howlett.
So we have one vacancy as things stand and two if Jerrett goes.
If Howlett is rookied that would fit the 1 year contract talk (recent article on McGrathās contract negotiation in HS), that would make 3 senior list vacancies.
We take a pick at 48 and we maybe promote Draper and Long (if Long survives the cut and needs to be promoted because of 3 years on the rookie list?), mopping up the other 2 senior list vacancies.
If we went with 2 upgraded rookies and Howlett dropped to the rookie list, with Smack already there, that would make pick 48 and 2 rookie picks.
That would be the minimalist way of proceeding. We could possibly drop Morgan to the rookie list, but we might prefer to give him a one year contract on the senior list if we wanted to take a punt on a couple of rookies for a year and only have to deal with one two year contract for an untried player at pick 48.
This is assuming we see more value in going into the 2018 draft deeper and maybe trading for some earlier picks. Given we have given away our third rounder in 2018 and are getting by with GWSās second rounder. If we really donāt see any talent beyond pick 48 worth investing 2 years in, then a very conservative approach to the 2017 draft may be a good idea given we have got 3 young but established best 22 players coming into the side.
Iām actually really surprised we havenāt delisted anyone else yet.
Apart from the fact that we are Essendon, is there any reason Howlett would be dropped to the rookie list? If we want to keep him for a year (and given he is nominally an inside mid Iād hope weād be looking at some state league players to replace him) why wouldnāt we just keep him on the main list for a year?