The discussion here seems to revolve around PP’s initial post to “delist 6 just because you can”
He’s actually since modified this to options that involve trading out some of the six, presumably for draft picks (or, as I said earlier, part of a possible trade deal for trade targets)
The second option is something no ones really going to disagree with - especially given our depth of medium / tall defenders.
But there’s a huge difference between this and going for pick 106,107, & 108 just because philosophically we should have more list turnover.
That’s fantasising in a serious way.