I was sure it was a ruck free kick, but didnt watch the replay.
just that the other week umps called us back and cost us a certain goal.
And he said “cant play on from a ruck free kick”
Yet freo did and kicked a goal, now someone made a error
Also AFL want to make rucks still relevant, yet they are keen on getting rid of boundary throw ins with all the free kicks for deliberate out of bounds. If you only need a ruck for Centre bounce and a few stoppages they are less relevant
I like boundary throw ins about our game, looks like they will be extinct and we will become the same as soccer, the way the deliberate out of bounds is going.
Id like to return it back to anyone can deliberately knock it over the line.
Now the outcome is a 50/50 contest. I dont see whats so bad from that.
its well known that it is easier to run the clock down by uncontested kicking round the backline.
Also should be able to deliberately kick it out of bounds.as long as its not on the full.
If a player can kick 50 metres down the ground and get a stoppage, its a better result than a free kick to opposition, and encourages players to kick to touch, and encourages opposition to try and keep the ball in if they can, not wait for it to go out and get a free kick. which is pathetic.
Also might make the umpires job easier and less “interpretation” of what they think the player was aiming to do.
Result is more contested footy.
The way the game is going and the changes they are making it will be all uncontested keepings off.
Boundary throw ins also gives players a small break.
ALso deliberate behinds annoy me too, players should be able to rush a behind, only exception should be from a kick out.
Knee jerk reactions to stop the hawks game plan. was just that.
30second goal kicking rule i quite like, even though they brought it in for Lloydy.