I'm reasonably sure Hawthorns checks my thread each year.If I was a recruiter I would be checking opposition fan based threads like this.....so much for keeping him on the down low
We should've got Puopolo.
I'm reasonably sure Hawthorns checks my thread each year.If I was a recruiter I would be checking opposition fan based threads like this.....so much for keeping him on the down low
We should've got Puopolo.
Assuming we haven't been "hiding" him, is there any real evidence he's even good enough for a rookie slot?
If the ASADA investigation has taught us anything it's that evidence is irrelevant when you start with a preconceived outcome. With that in mind, we're definitely on the right track with this thread although maybe it should be re-titled 'how many Brownlow Jake Long win?'.
Not sure about Brownlows, but I'm thinking multiple Norm Smiths.
Bump
Is he actually any good?
Or just because he has Long as a surname, we must have him.
The last Long wasn't exactly anything special.
Bump
Reckless, low impact & high contact.
Drawing 225 demerit points. Early guilty plea reduces it to 193.25, due to previous good record, Benfti can accept a one week suspension and 32.5 points to his future record.
Is he actually any good?
Or just because he has Long as a surname, we must have him.
The last Long wasn't exactly anything special.
jake is goodIs he actually any good?
Or just because he has Long as a surname, we must have him.
The last Long wasn't exactly anything special.
Reckless, low impact & high contact.Bump
Drawing 225 demerit points. Early guilty plea reduces it to 193.25, due to previous good record, Benfti can accept a one week suspension and 32.5 points to his future record.
Reckless, low impact & high contact.Bump
Drawing 225 demerit points. Early guilty plea reduces it to 193.25, due to previous good record, Benfti can accept a one week suspension and 32.5 points to his future record.
fark that, I'm taking the deal from ASADA
Are you saying you would prefer $1million over a one week suspension?
One player has nominated under the provisions of the Father-Son Rookie Pre-Selection Rule: Jack Long, son of Michael.
Thank god we got young longy
One player has nominated under the provisions of the Father-Son Rookie Pre-Selection Rule: Jack Long, son of Michael.
Thank god we got young longy
■■■■ WE NOMINATED THE WRONG ONE
One player has nominated under the provisions of the Father-Son Rookie Pre-Selection Rule: Jack Long, son of Michael.
Thank god we got young longy
We haven't yet.
If someone else wants them, they can take him in the National Draft. I doubt anyone will take him in the ND, but it is still a possibility.
Or we've done today is put dibs on him if he is available it the rookie draft.
One player has nominated under the provisions of the Father-Son Rookie Pre-Selection Rule: Jack Long, son of Michael.
Thank god we got young longy
We haven't yet.
If someone else wants them, they can take him in the National Draft. I doubt anyone will take him in the ND, but it is still a possibility.
Or we've done today is put dibs on him if he is available it the rookie draft.
this makes me think of anthony long, was there any genuine chance of him being drafted by anyone else when took him at 30 odd
Hope he’s better than anthony
One player has nominated under the provisions of the Father-Son Rookie Pre-Selection Rule: Jack Long, son of Michael.
Thank god we got young longy
We haven't yet.
If someone else wants them, they can take him in the National Draft. I doubt anyone will take him in the ND, but it is still a possibility.
Or we've done today is put dibs on him if he is available it the rookie draft.
this makes me think of anthony long, was there any genuine chance of him being drafted by anyone else when took him at 30 odd
apart from the fact that we aren't going to use a 2nd round draft pick on Jake, if we end up getting it will now be our final rookie draft selection
Anthony was a good junior.
He was rated and we got him at about where we should have I think... from memory.
Hope he's better than anthony
I hope he's better than Michael
Anthony was a good junior.
He was rated and we got him at about where we should have I think... from memory.
IMHO we reached for him - he was a late round or rookie pick in my book, but we took him with a second rounder. But the pick we took him with was our last live pick.
Personally I was hoping we'd take Christiansen with that pick and try to get Long in the rookie draft, but there were whispers that Sydney had their eye on Long and I think the club was gunshy about losing another famous name to a rival club after passing over Rioli a couple of years previously.
Anthony was a good junior.
He was rated and we got him at about where we should have I think... from memory.
IMHO we reached for him - he was a late round or rookie pick in my book, but we took him with a second rounder. But the pick we took him with was our last live pick.
Personally I was hoping we'd take Christiansen with that pick and try to get Long in the rookie draft, but there were whispers that Sydney had their eye on Long and I think the club was gunshy about losing another famous name to a rival club after passing over Rioli a couple of years previously.
And fair enough too...
this makes me think of anthony long, was there any genuine chance of him being drafted by anyone else when took him at 30 odd
[font='Helvetica Neue']One player has nominated under the provisions of the Father-Son Rookie Pre-Selection Rule: Jack Long, son of Michael.[/font]
[font='Helvetica Neue']Thank god we got young longy[/font]
We haven't yet.
If someone else wants them, they can take him in the National Draft. I doubt anyone will take him in the ND, but it is still a possibility.
Or we've done today is put dibs on him if he is available it the rookie draft.