Thought Kav deserved a go with his form in the VFL. Melksham did not. 2 sets of rules.
Agree. Not good!
Steinberg still in Smack NOT.
I give up… I have stuck by all selections to date this year thinking the must be a logical reason but this weeks I just don’t understand.
I am super happy Pears is finally given a go.
Jeez its so easy to coach from our couches, how hard must it be to coach a team with low morale, 33% injured, a 4 draft pick gap in 2012 and 2013, a bunch of players with little or no AFL experience complaining about never getting a game, but not being quite good enough, a poorly performing group of forwards, a poorly performing group of mids and a hostile media baying for blood.
Have a look at last weeks presser then tell me which of the inclusions is a new young player
Like for like; no matter what, we don't play two ruckmen!
In 2011 we continued to play 3 ruckman despite the team balance.
In 2015 we continue to play 1 ruckman despite team balance.
They’re bound to work it out by 2019.
Your idea of team balance is obviously out of sync with ALL the coaches then eh?
Wonder who is correct … mmmm??
Freo, West coast and Hawthorn are all playing two rucks this week.
Not sure how those three teams are travelling?
But yeah… ALL coaches, hey?
geez …we don’t have 2 ruckman because we currently have 3 players around 200cm who aren’t that great at foward line pressure when the ball hits the gound… (JD, Carlise, Giles)
The eagles for example have two ruckman because kennedy 194cm and Darling 191cm are quite mobile
The hawks can have 2 ruckman because Roughy is a borderline midfielder and Gunston isnt that big so both their key forwards are great at fwd line pressure and mobility when the ball hits the ground
Freo have two ruckman because Pav is their only key forward
Its really not hard to realise why we are only playing one ruckman…
can someone please explain to me how Melksham is getting a game this week.
Hird (a week ago): ok Jake, we're dropping you back to the ressies this week.
Melk: What! Why?
Hird: you're just not working hard enough. Once you can show us you are dedicated to working hard both ways and getting more ball you can stay there.
Melk: pfft! Whatevs. I can díck around on a flank in the VFL this week and you'll still put me back in the ones next week ahead of dudes like Kav and Browne.
Hird: ........yeah, you're right. We good?
No Smack, but Pears and Melksham in...... fkn LOL.
The problem is, with Hooker, Giles, Carlisle, Daniher in, and add Smack, we are a little bit tall.
Two tall forwards, Two tall backs and a ruck is too tall now?
Pears and Steinberg are seen as talls.
Better drop Myers then.
Yes same height.
It’s who they been played on …KPP or ‘talls’
Clearly Pears replaces Gwilt.
Why stop at Myers?
Better drop Edwards, Goddard, Heppel, Laverde, and Langford - all tall cos all with 1-2cm. (189-191cm).
Hell Heppel should play ruck his hair gives him another 6cm.
Happy for Tate, amazed at Steinberg but he's getting a game purely cause we have no one else.... Except hooker and smack forward
Everyone gets a chance week.
@benfti’s right, this does feel like Knighta’s last year.
If you think this season has sunk to a new low, just wait until next season.
True.
Pressure on Hird will be worse next year out of contract, too.
And what if the players cop bans?
Then the saga won’t end for years. It will drag on in court for years and years.
As for Hird, if the players cop bans- the media will be coming from everywhere calling for his head (much more so than now)- the club will probably sack him and put Harvey in charge. Though he shouldn’t be sacked if the players copped bans- he should be sacked for the woeful selection of the team over the course of the year.