we’re good at being consistently sh*t
We make a profit
We suck in heaps of members to pony up money each year
We play footy nice
We do good podcasts
Selling newspapers.
You just have to include our name anywhere in the newspaper and most Victorians will buy a copy because the only things that get written about us are stories of how disappointing we are. It’s like feeling compelled to read a story about kids torturing animals.
Zaka’s Instagram is on FLEEK
We are consistent … at letting other teams back in games no matter how bad the opponent
Jake Stringer
Our supporter forum sometimes has good puns
Just a random thought in all of this.
Are we a considerable part of the reason people believe the comp is evening out? By being unable to beat lowly teams and unable to win convincingly do we manufacture that result? I’m not the guy to do it, but if someone is bored with time up their sleeve I’d love to see how even the comp looks without us in it. As in, knock up a model that removes us completely. No Bombers games. Is the comp still anywhere as even if we’re not there making it look even by sneaking wins over better sides and allowing rabble sides to sneak wins over us?
A really worrying thought.
And GIFs don’t forget the GIFs
I had a few ideas but then realised I could just make a thread called Things Ridley Does Well.
We’re good for footy. We make all other teams look great.
Somehow things we do well still end up being a negative . . .
Flashmobs
Pharmacologically experimental environments
I knew where this thread was going before I even entered
Submission - we have that absolutely nailed!
Frees against. We win that every week.