Gutless coward who is using a social media led hate mob to rally against someone with no evidence whatsoever.
Do any of these morons realize Pell has appeared twice before the Commission already?
What other questions are they expecting him to answer?
Do these leftist hatemongers understand that pedophiles don't exactly publicise their activities and are actually very good at presenting a false image to others?
So how could he have possibly known?
Its an absolute disgrace and even worse that some of my fellow Essendon fans are seemingly in support of this guilty until innocent shit given the crap we have gone through in the last 4 years.
Some of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
You're clearly very knowledgble DT, so I'm going to assume you already know the answer to this question (as opposed to ignorantly shooting your mouth off).
You're right that Pell has already appeared twice.
The first hearing was in relation to the Ellis case - a case study discussing the dealings of Ellis (a victim) with the Church.
The second hearing was in relation to the establishment and administration of the Melbourne Response.
The Ballarat hearings are about an entirely different matter, being the abuses in Ballarat in the 70s. He's never, ever been examined on those matters, and he needs to be.
I note also that the previous two times he's appeared, the Commission concluded that the evidence Pell gave was inconsistent with evidence provided by other witnesses. Both times the commission preferred the evidence of the other witness.