Whilst Shiel is more dynamic.
I think as far as being stronger in contest, tackling intent, more creative by hand including under physical heat and better ability when fwd/overhead I’d go Parker also.
2 Likes
Lol.
Tom Browne just said that the Swans have ruled out trading Parker.
2 Likes
Let’s get back to our roots.
Shiel and Setterfield please.
What’s happened to the Setterfield talk? All gone very quiet.
6 Likes
Which makes a heap of sense. VC and hugely important player and only 25!
I didn’t bother getting involved in the Parker talk. Was never going to happen.
1 Like
I like Parker for his goal kicking.
I guess Shiel is more of the jet style player. I think we need a more inside mid which Parker is.
Not to say Shiel is a bad player. I think he has more injury concerns and doesn’t hit the scoreboard .
1 Like
Didn’t want him anyway. Dud 
2 Likes
Never wanted him in the first place*
*may or may not be true
Shiel
Puke Sarker
Duke Farker
2 Likes
Fark Hardar
4 Likes
Why do you keep saying that when i already told you how many games he played the last 3 years?
Shiel : 22, 25, 23 = 70 Games
Parker: 22, 24, 26 = 72 Games
Shutup Tom. You have had a poor 2018 so far.
Shiel gets injured too often, anyway.
parker is fkg garbage. picked after steinberg therefore has to be worse.
2 Likes
Ah yes old mate stainberg
