Trade talk - from September 2025 (Part 9)

Yeah I agree sends a strong message to other players that you can’t leave while your contracted.

Deal

11 Likes

McKenzie and it’s a deal

5 Likes

Go back to the well Hawthorn.

Henry fkn Hustwaite

8 Likes

No. Why the ■■■■ is Hustwaite being mentioned so much?? He ■■■■■■■ sucks.

4 Likes

He’s another setterfiled slow tall mid yuk

McKenzie is their list manager. Don’t think they’ll be trading him.

2 Likes

How can they (a) know we want that and (b) get that trade done if our position is we aren’t trading Zach?

SHUT UP AND TAKE MY ■■■■■■■ MONEY

3 Likes

That’s cute

But this first plus what pick 14ish and pick 32ish before bids and other bullshit, and a dude you’re delisting next year anyways.

Nah.

Magically Tom Morris broke that story.

Fancy that.

3 Likes

Take that and run. Another 2nd this year means we should be able to trade up somewhere and still keep points for Sweid.

Hustwaite can stay away

5 Likes

Almost there… almost. A bit more to add.

2 Likes

“Ok, Hawthorn it’s two top 10 picks”.
“We can’t”
“Ok then… 2025 R1, 2026 R1 and MacKenzie”.
“We won’t”.
“Righto… 2025 R1 and a best 12 player. The player is to replace Merrett, the pick is the contract tax”.
“No can do”
“Right… fark off then, you were never serious”.

Simples…(even though I reckon the Worpel pick should be included in all the above…)

1 Like

If this is their initial offer we may be in a better position than I thought. Maybe

3 Likes

Haha very good

No to Hustwaite. He isn’t very good and we’re tight on list spots anyway

9, 26 First, and Mackenzie.

Done.

Hawks get their missing piece and we get 3 first rounders.

6 Likes

Deal for me

2 Likes

One way to improve this would be to delete the words “and Henry Hustwaite”

2 Likes

Any other garbage the Hawks wanna throw in so they dont have to pay to get rid of it? Maybe some broken washing machines etc

2 Likes