Trade talk - Tobe or not To Be

Might be time for a thread title update. It was not Toby.

8 Likes

If it’s not tobe then maybe Presti?

1 Like

With that ankle monitor on?

Telling their AFLW team that they don’t matter

1 Like

My wife attends quite a few Brisbane functions and she says there is a lot of talk at the moment that Sam Marshall gets to Essendon.

17 Likes

They just appointed Spike. Does Mitchell come as a line coach.

3 Likes

Thread title change. What can we Ferret for Merret?

3 Likes

God I hope not, that guy is the pits

1 Like

The pick we’re getting for Merrett looking a lot worse.
Hawks will be evens to make the Grand Final now

3 Likes

17, 25, 26, F1st, FF1st! Ok deal

Only if he gives Jobe his farken medal back…

10 Likes

I think it’s meant to be Sam Marshall

8 Likes

Oops lol

What would we actually prefer for Merrett?

Option A — Melbourne:
Pick 10 + a later sweetener

Option B — Hawthorn:
Pick 15 + 25/26

Option C — Hawthorn:
Pick 15 + future first

Assuming Merrett is going, which return would you take?

For me, the interesting comparison is whether the certainty and higher-end quality of Pick 10 outweighs getting two meaningful assets from Hawthorn.

I would burn my membership if that EVER happened.

1 Like

The fact the AFL has the contracts data is meaningless. At any point in time, the majority of players are contracted for 1-4 years. If the FA offer is for five, any club will have a huge amount of free space in years 4-5 simply because other contracts haven’t been extended yet. So, any club could fit it in.

C every time for me. Going to need some solid capital next year (even if it ends up mid to late 20s).

Thread title change - just not to be

1 Like

Thread title change: “This masthead can do it itself”

5 Likes

Just say we, ffs.

2 Likes