Im not against vaxs, i do have some concerns, not relating to autism or mercury, but concerns about drug companys selling vaccines that give mild protection to disease's where getting hit by a car is more likely to occur than the disease they are vaccinating against, under the guise of "you can never be too sure"
Do you know why the likelihood of contracting such diseases is so low?
Because of
wait for it
no seriously this is great
because of
preventative vaccination programs
You missed my point.
I was sharing my concern of having vaccinations for disease where the Risk V Cost V Health benefit are not worth the gains Vs spending the money or resources elesewhere. (like preventing car accidents) (and within context of what i said in a earlier post, it is risk V award like all drugs.)
I was never arguing against vaccines or that they should be stopped in anyway, only that good risk assement has to be taken,and that part of the welcoming all vaccines simply because they are "vaccines" is a blind path. I was just airing my concerns about throwing caution to the wind over vaccinations, like all drugs.
I also have a genuine concern that all the BS surrounding Vacines now has possibly made it harder to Genuinely ID if a Vaccine is a failure or causes unwanted or damaging side effects. We are so flooded with Autism BS that the next person to have a concern over a Vaccine will become a Boy who cried wolf scenario. But that is another story.
Risk assessment? Ok, risk assessment on the polio vaccine is google image search for "polio victims", and decide whether is isn't worth the US$0.30 per dose (source)
Do you seriously think factors like cost v benefit have never been considered before?