The AFL listed blokes we need to do well are doing well.
All we can ask/hope for
2 Likes
Does he replace Weideman if he plays? Or not play a second ruck and have Weid, Voss and Langford in the forward line?
1 Like
I think Hayes, Baldwin and Montgomerie have been pretty good. Cox just OK, at this stage. And Voss playing a level above the rest.
We really suffer with having no AFL listed midfielders running through the middle - will love to see Tsatas have a crack
1 Like
Can’t find a stream for the Wheelchairs, but we are in trouble.
The Weekend is in danger of not being Won.
| Team | For | Against | Result | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFL | 96 | 46 | W | 209% |
| VFLW | 42 | 14 | W | 300% |
| VFL | 34 | 53 | L | 64% |
| VWFL | 14 | 62 | L | 23% |
| TOTAL | 186 | 175 | 2 - 2 | 106.29% |
GET THAT FOREIGNER OUT OF THE COMMENTARY BOX
Weed Voss Langford. With weed playing 2nd ruck
Raining now
Baldwin and Voss are clearly AFL quality. Probably Narkle as well tbh.
Cox started to get more of the ball and looked pretty assured as the second quarter went on, but mostly deep in defence so not very damaging.
Is Cox playing on a tall or a small ?
The commentator watches Bounce. It all makes sense now.
He’s on a small.
1 Like
Any hawks players worth taking in the msd?
Such an obvious armchop. How the fk do they miss that
1 Like
Cox started a bit slow, but is working into the game nicely - some good composure
You might as well just full-on attack the man at this level because the umps won’t call it.
BOLDwin
They will against us though
Cox trying to injure himself
Hard collision cox but given the mark / free
Drop this second ruck B.S. and have a designated CHF.
2 Likes