3 Smith
2 Wright
1 Redman
3 Smith
2 Redman
1 Wright
We need 2 lots of votes to go in a certain way to change anything, and I’ve got other things to do, so calling it now.
Devon Smith 222
Mason Redman 98
Jake Stringer 51
Tom Cutler 37
Peter Wright 31
Zach Merrett 26
Matt Guelfi 3
Alec Waterman 3
Nick Hind 2
Sam Draper 1
So
Devon Smith 5
Mason Redman 4
Jake Stringer 3
Tom Cutler 2
Peter Wright 1
3 Likes
Cumulative
Zach Merrett 57
Darcy Parish 50
Jake Stringer 30
Jordan Ridley 26
Nick Hind 21
Mason Redman 16
Jayden Laverde 14
Sam Draper 14
Andrew McGrath 13
Dyson Heppell 13
Peter Wright 13
Anthony McDonald-Tipungwuti 10
Kyle Langford 10
Cale Hooker 9
Nik Cox 8
Aaron Francis 6
Archie Perkins 5
Devon Smith 5
Sam Durham 3
Andrew Phillips 3
Harry Jones 2
Tom Cutler 2
3 Likes
There’s a great weaknessin the voting system revealed here:
Devon Smith 222
Mason Redman 98
which gives a score of
Devon Smith 5
Mason Redman 4
Smith got 2.27 times as many votes as Redman, yet his final score for the round is only 1.25 times Redman’s.
1 Like
Yeah, so what? If a guy dominates, that’s what happens.
3 Likes
3,2,1 thats how the umps do it….using weighted votes would also allow voters to favour certain player even worse than they do now….and yes it happens now
Parish needs something special from here.
1 Like
I think there’s value in the 1-5 suggestion.
Parish basically needs to win the Dogs game off his own boot and Merrett not to influence, then get votes again next week