The 3 vote format seems confusing to you.
Said in jest, I’m mostly in agreement.
1 Like
Clarke 3
Hepp 2
Prostitute 1
3 Clarke - great performance on 2019 “debut”. Good to see coaches have read Blitz that he should play in seniors and we should play a tagger
2 Parish - Good to see coaching staff have read Blitz saying he should never go back to HFF
1 Guelfi - always putting in and popping up at crucial moments .Good to see coaching staff ignored Blitz’s comments about his hair.
1 Like
3 Heppel
2 Parish
1 Clarke
McGrath was also fantastic
Hooker solid down back.
How can anyone not put Hep in their votes, he was BOG.
This
3 Heppell
2 Parish
1 Clarke
Apologies Hooker
For the sake of it
3 parish
2 Clarke
1 guelfi
Young blokes deserve some more praise
- Clarke, great performance from a guy who clearly wants it
- Heppell. Looked like his old self. Having a good season overall.
- Parish, he has grown so much since the acid was poured on him.
I am especially proud of our younger players today.
Well done Redman, McGrath, Laverde and Langford
Good team effort, the way it should be if we want to play finals
Clarke - 3
Heppell - 2
Parish - 1
3 - Heppell
2 - Hooker
1 - Clarke
3.Parish
2.Clarke
1.Hepp
Guelfi
Heppell
Walla
This
- Clarke
- Hep
- Guelfi
3 D.Clarke
2 D.Parish
1 M.Guelfi
Clarke
Heppell
Parish
- Guelfi
- Parish
- Clarke
Guelf
Hepp
Parish
Clarke, entire back line and Walla - 3 goals is nothing to be sneered at.
- Heppell
- Parish
- D. Clarke
I am amazed people complain about a midfielder almost guaranteed to win the Brownlow and so many here are giving Heppell 3 votes.
If TBell didn’t work his ■■■ off to tap it to Heppell who sat 10 metres off the contest, he wouldn’t have racked up such high stats.
Added to this the ineptitude of FC to not see this happen and make him accountable was worse.
He played a great captains game but got to do pretty much what he wanted with FC lack of gameplay etc.
My votes would be as follows -
- D Clarke
- Guelfi
- Parish