Who to poach?

GET THIS MAN!!!

7 Likes

Moving on those 3 would make us younger (assuming we pick up only 18 year olds). But you need to move on 600+ games to be less experienced (assuming you don’t bring someone in via trade/fa). Merrett moving as well might shift that needle though.

Premiership player, all Australian, Brownlow medalist and 3 time best and fairest winner Tom Mitchell? I mean guess they both hosted podcasts.

2 Likes

Parish and Merrett are no brainers to move on. We need to give Robey, Sharp and either Tsatas or another young midfielder opportunities in the middle. Scott has already admitted there isn’t room in the side for everyone. I’d keep Setterfield as VFL depth.

I’d rather recruit a Green, Sidebottom, or even Melksham to play a HF role than move Merrett permanently to HF. I really think a smart vet forward is a massive need given the inexperience of Caddy, May, Kako.

Lean into whichever Coach we get to lure a hard working vet like Scott did with Goldy too - eg Hinkley / Powell-Pepper.

1 Like

be careful, you move them on and we become exponentially younger again.

Understand everyone wants to blood the kids but doing so as you suggests puts us in a perilous position that Melbourne did many many years ago, kids teaching kids.

If we want to move on the senior players, we simply must bring in experienced guys to help guide said kids. They do not have to be stars but pseudo on field coaches if you like.

4 Likes

As per my comment, I’d move them on and replace with vets playing different roles.

Personally, I doubt experienced players come here if there aren’t experienced players here to begin with. They’d prefer to have some quality around them to help even though we think they are useless. Even North still had Corr, McDonald and Darcy Tucker when they got Darling, Parker and Daniel. And this year Simpkin and Logue join them. It may not seem much, but the experience we get would want to focus on their performance as much as everyone else. And they’ll lean on the oldies at times. North are a tough comparison because I’d argue their next experienced players (Zurhaar, Larkey, Xerri, LDU, Stephens, Comben and Curtis) are better as a group than ours. We have better individual players, but some aren’t available often enough (Ridley, Martin) and others we don’t like because of their link to our historical failures (McGrath, Duursma, Caldwell, Durham, Perkins).

There isn’t a specific quota of how many games average you need or what average age you have. You just expect to be in the bottom 2 or 3 in the league for both of those (not just overall list, but also the weekly 23). If you’re doing that and you have 1 mentor / teacher in every part of the ground, then you have a start. But if that doesn’t happen, then we’ll have to switch to the Richmond model (before their 2017 premiership) where they had no experienced mentors. The closest they had was Ben Cousins and we wouldn’t consider him a mentor. They had no premiership experience and relied on youth and older heads. 2010 they had Richo, Cousins, Troy Simmonds, Shane Tuck, Chris Newman, 2011 it was just Tuck and Newman, 2012 Brad Miller, Moore and Jake King joined them, 2013 stripped back to Tuck, Newman, Aaron Edwards, and King, 2014 Foley, Ivan Maric and Chaplin joined them, 2015 stripped back to Newman, Foley, Maric, Chaplin and Deledio joined them, 2016 stripped back to Maric, Chaplin, Deledio, Shaun Hampson and Grigg. None of those names scream leaders that you must have to teach the kids. I rate Newman, but we wouldn’t consider getting someone who hadn’t even won a final as one of our leaders.

I doubt we attract 3 players to begin with anyway. And the three I named (Guelfi, Gresham & Setterfield) are barely playing this year anyway. I’m also not sure what this Essendon Spirit angle (if we choose to follow this path) will bring with it. I don’t expect players like Toby Greene to come here even though he was a Bomber fan. He’ll lean towards Geelong if that’s an option and I wouldn’t blame him. And I’m not sure how attractive we’ll be to ‘outsiders’.

A lot relies on how we handle the extra $3mil of salary cap. If we top up (mid twenties players like Shiel, Stringer and Smith), then we attract other leaders, but as long as we aren’t trading away future picks, we can probably stay the course and just make better decisions at the draft. How we handle the trade period will define whether we’re staying on the current direction (lean towards youth) or go for a top up (like St Kilda).

1 Like

someone who can see an spot in the best 23 at Essendon, but are currently playing state league at their club.

2 Likes

Agree $2m per year for 3 years. Make him Captain immediately

3 Likes

Fiorini is one.

3 Likes

Arty Jones might be put up for trade by the dogs.

Rowan Marshall if we don’t have faith in Bryan and want someone experienced to protect HVH and give the young midfield some protection

Charlie Ballard will be somewhere else, and plays a position we will need.

We need to walk someone to the PSD, I don’t think we would have the balls to walk Walter though

Isn’t this just the trade thread with a different name

9 Likes

looks good

1 Like

Its Sullivan Robey & Dyson Sharps club now.

4 Likes

What’s Derek Eggmolesse-Smith doing these days?

Anyone heard the rumour we are preparing a massive Offer for Harley Reid, given our cap space.

Midfield of Robey, Reid and Sharp :exploding_head:

Pretty sure he aint for trade and would cost us Bewick as we wouldn’t have the picks to do it

Am I the only one that thinks Harley Reid is overrated, he might become a champion but damn he gets talked up.

1 Like

No, you’re not. Don’t want (given the asking price). He’s also a staging FIGJAM.

Is there a new president we could poach?

1 Like