Your votes(no exclamation mark) Ess vs GWS

3 Saad
2 Langford
1 McGrath

Votes for those who at least contested strongly even if they were ineffectual.

3 Saad
2 McGrath
1 Shiel

  1. Langford
    2.Stringer
    1.Francis

McGrath lost me with too much fumbling and butchering of the ball

  1. Langford (played well enough in general and took his opportunities going forward)
  2. Saad (didn’t stop trying, did well on his opponet (mainly green))
  3. Francis (on effort alone, Edging out McGrath who fumbled his way out of the top 3 but was everywhere and could have had a great game on another day)
1 Like

No.

Francis

3 Hepp
2 Saad
1 McGrath

1 Like

Same as @Lance84

1 Like

Heppell 3
Saad 2
Ridley 1

Stringer
McGrath
Saad

With Heppell and Ambrose as the only other players who looked like they weren’t recovering from a two day bender, there wasn’t a lot of choice.

@Alan_Noonan_10 - enjoy the collation of these. You get a nice soft entry given the number of votes polled is directly proportionate to the team’s on field performance.

Let me know if you want the previous year’s data to work from.

3 votes Langford
2 votes Saad
1 vote Francis

No votes

3 me for going to that shithole
2 Saad
1 McGrath

Ah…nah

1 Like
  1. Saad
  2. Heppell
  3. Stringer

Seriously how did 3,2,1 become 3,4,5…grrr

  1. Essendon fans who turned up.
  2. Parish for responding.
  3. Draper .

Same .

Lang
Stringer
Saad