3 Saad
2 Langford
1 McGrath
Votes for those who at least contested strongly even if they were ineffectual.
3 Saad
2 McGrath
1 Shiel
- Langford
2.Stringer
1.Francis
McGrath lost me with too much fumbling and butchering of the ball
- Langford (played well enough in general and took his opportunities going forward)
- Saad (didnât stop trying, did well on his opponet (mainly green))
- Francis (on effort alone, Edging out McGrath who fumbled his way out of the top 3 but was everywhere and could have had a great game on another day)
No.
Francis
3 Hepp
2 Saad
1 McGrath
Heppell 3
Saad 2
Ridley 1
Stringer
McGrath
Saad
With Heppell and Ambrose as the only other players who looked like they werenât recovering from a two day bender, there wasnât a lot of choice.
@Alan_Noonan_10 - enjoy the collation of these. You get a nice soft entry given the number of votes polled is directly proportionate to the teamâs on field performance.
Let me know if you want the previous yearâs data to work from.
3 votes Langford
2 votes Saad
1 vote Francis
No votes
3 me for going to that shithole
2 Saad
1 McGrath
AhâŚnah
- Saad
- Heppell
- Stringer
Seriously how did 3,2,1 become 3,4,5âŚgrrr
- Essendon fans who turned up.
- Parish for responding.
- Draper .
Same .
Lang
Stringer
Saad