#13 Nik Cox - thru 2026 (Part 1)

Are his injuries related to his first season? My memory is he had a couple of ankle/contact type injuries in the 2022 pre season and then has only started having the back issues in the 2023 preseason.

But a stitch in time saves nine.

5 Likes

We pushed him onto the field instead of focusing on getting his body ready. So we didn’t injure his back in his first year, but we neglected the foundation work that would keep him healthy long term. We knew he was a slow burn, but rushed him.

On the surface I’d agree this is highly plausible.

Sometimes the ā€˜play the kids’ mantra is not the best path of development. I think we are witnessing a patient approach now, which unfortunately is now reactive instead of proactive.

1 Like

by that logic you shouldn’t be playing any newly drafted kids in the first year, which is obviously not feesible.

his issues have seemingly started in the off season of 2022, in the prime building phase in your example, cos once he did show signs of 1 year burn out he was dropped and didn’t return, from vague memory i think he was still available and or playing vfl around the time of finals so could have been picked.

but there is something in peoples concerns re drafting.
I know people hold up the curnow stuff as the beacon of hope, but they seem to forget curnows injuries were self inflicted by being a ratbag off the field, wasn’t it a skating accident or something that ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  him up.

the mckays, kings, de konings, weitering and a whole bunch of other talls don’t seem to have missed as much footy (granted i didn’t look that much into it) through growing pains and either played afl or vfl footy in that time.

It’s probably a bigger indication the fitness department has been ā– ā– ā– ā– , and the 2 most at risk kids cos of height have suffered due to it.
That’s why it was a shock with all the sackings/leavings that murphy kept his job. that’s why i’m skeptical about the ā€œtaking a caustious lineā€ from the club.
i’m more inclined to think they don’t want heat/backlash for not moving murphy on, so that line is getting trotted out.

cos if they were being cautious and results don’t matter this year cos it’s building for the long term, why did stringer, after brad admits he was playing injured last year, and also getting injured in preseason and questionable looking physique for a professional footballer, only play one game in the vfl, when even people on here thought he was still labouring and then other posters on here pointed out he always starts slow when coming back into the afl ?
if you were cautious and even supporters can see stuff in stringer, why was his ā€œcautious approachā€ only 1 week in the vfl ?
why not get him cherry ripe in the vfl before getting him back, again considering it’s not about a sugar hit this year and about long term development ?

1 Like

There’s a difference between blindly not playing kids and making sure they are ready.

Tsatas looks to have had leg development weaknesses that made him vulnerable to his knee injury. That should have been identified and a program in place to build him up properly so he could handle full training. Instead we are doing the strength stuff after the injury, rather than before.

Cox and Reid have both suffered back injuries that are likely preventable with adequate strengthening. That strengthening program may have made them unavailable for games or main training for a block. Instead, we’ve injured them and now they are missing due to rehab AND the strength program that should have happened at the start.

We don’t need to rush our draftees into the team in round 1. Being injury free for the first years is more valuable than scaling back football over a 6 month block due to focusing on getting their physique ready.

1 Like

Footage of Nik strengthening his back:

13 Likes

There was a point where gumby took a mark in preseason and we all thought he would be the new John Coleman.

Reckon this pick will end up the same.

That sounds like baseless speculation to me.

4 Likes

you couldn’t tell he was playing injured last year?

Again this seems like complete speculation. His legs could have been perfectly strong and he just landed on a funny angle or something that made his knee go, you cant prevent every injury.

4 Likes

Pretty bloody obvious cause and effect to me. This isn’t an elaborate conspiracy theory. We’ve got young players who have not been physically developed when they arrived and they’ve broken down in the exact way you’d predict from those weaknesses.

1 Like

He literally missed most of 2022 with an injury to that leg. He’s now in a strengthening program to protect that leg. This isn’t stuff that couldn’t be predicted.

1 Like

You could say… a stitch in time, saves nine.

Awww crap

1 Like

Was that injury from being played every week in his first season or was it a totally unrelated injury? I dont pretend to know, im not really sure why anyone would.

1 Like

I’d question whether those of us on the sidelines would really know if this statement is right or wrong.

2 Likes

If he had a back injury during his first season that I dont know about and we played him anyway then that would be obvious cause and effect. As far as I know he didnt.

Cox and Reid have both broken down with stress fractures. They’ve both been pulled out of training to build that up properly. That’s a pretty good indication that they hadn’t been prepared properly.

2 Likes