another inconsistent player? no thanks
2 Likes
Agreed. Plus he’ll be 28
Plus he had his chance to join us a few years back and stayed. So f@rk him.
4 Likes
So Hawks or pies then
1 Like
Sloane’s too old for us. Bring in Wines pls
1 Like
We haven’t the currency to get Wines even if we wanted to. Port will want our first pick and Fantasia.
Pass.
He’s 28, one of the best in the comp at his position and exactly what we need. Would be mental to not make a play for him.
1 Like
Another bloke who chases kicks and doesn’t defend. No thanks.
1 Like
There’s no doubt he’s a gun.
But he’d be a wasted gun in our side. His impact would be minimal with the level incompetence around him.
Any player that turns up at our club is going to be on a downward spiral to retirement. Ruining careers thats what we do best.
He likely would be wasted but that shouldn’t stop us from going after someone who fits our exact needs.
Something to consider maybe
2 Likes
so what your getting at is that we should…
BRING HIM IN
Turns 29 and has a bad foot injury.
Crows are dreaming that a club will cough up to get Sloane
Don’t want. Too old. Would rather get games into kids that we rate. If we don’t rate, delist and get kids you rate.
Remember when Hawks sold us Mark Williams with farked knees? Reckon Crows will do the same with Sloane
1 Like
What money will the Crows put on a contract offer now? 1 or 2 seasons moderate coin?
Geelong showing some interest in Dahlhaus, should we be as well?
Nope.
Off field ‘issues’.
Stringer and Dahl are no good together.
1 Like
Does paying 600-800k over 4-5 years for a player like Daulhaus or Gaff rob us of the ability to pay for our great talents down the track and keep them together ie; Orazio, Parish, McGrath?
Port came pretty hard last time @Raz
I’m all to get talent that’s there but if we take the plunge with a cap that may not be as free as previous years, I’d want it to target a particular deficiency or weakness.
NO.