Ok, it feels a little bit late to be writing this now, but its become clear to me that there are a number of Blitzers who have very different views on what we should be trying to do with the 2021 season. So I thought I’d start this to discuss.
In my view, blitzers appear to be (roughly) breaking into three groups:
Strategy 1: DEVELOP WHILE WINNING APPROACH
I don’t think there is anyone who doesn’t see this as a development year. But there are a lot who still think winning, and possibly finishing in the eight is an absolute goal. Some features of this group are (not every member has every feature):
- Get upset when we lose, even if we lose in a ‘good’ way.
- Are upset we don’t have more small depth.
- Those who want us to use all our options in the MSD to give us short-term cover.
- Want us to develop a winning culture.
- Want the best possible side selected each week.
- Want us to finish as high on the ladder as possible.
- Are looking for trade options and are willing to trade big for any perceived holes.
- A view that implementing a winning culture requires winning games.
- Think the coach should make moves to win the game, even if it moves away from the gameplan we’re trying to embed.
Strategy 2: REBUILD FOCUS
These Blitzers want the focus to be on a mix of implementing systems of play, developing youngsters, instilling a winning culture, and recruiting for the future.
- Assume the rebuild will be 2-3 years, so don’t expect winning games should be the priority until around 2023.
- Take a longer term view on drafting, recruitment and game day selections.
- Are happy to sacrifice wins to prioritise embedding systems and developing kids.
- Want to build a winning culture
- Don’t believe this requires us to win games
- Believe that older players can play a role for leadership, to help embed systems, and to help with creating a winning culture. But if that some who are role players will be sacrificed for kids development.
- That wins in 2021 are not a goal, and in fact to the degree they worsen our draft position can hurt us.
I think this is the biggest group on Blitz on the draft/trade threads. Less so in the gameday/match review threads. I’m in this group.
Strategy 3: DEVELOP AT ALL COSTS
This is a group spear-headed by @darkknightpheonix. Their focus is on developing at all costs, prioritising this over all other considerations. So if there is a younger player in the VFL, they should be played over any player close to the end. Even if the gap is huge.
The big discussion on this point was in the Hooker thread, where DKP argued that Hooker should be dropped so that Eyre or Bryan got game time. This would accelerate the development of the youngster, and let us know a bit about them.
Tanking
Just to discuss this elephant in the room.
Both the second and third strategies could arguably be charged as being tanking. This isn’t correct, even for the develop at all costs basis. With neither of these approaches is the intention to go out and lose games. However, both of them are prioritising wins in later years (say 2023 or 2024) over 2021 performance.
It is absolutely an impact of adopting these strategies that we will finish lower and get better picks. But neither strategy is focussed on losing games.
.
.
So do people agree with these groups? Are people sitting in them, or fluctuating between them on and off gameday?