It honestly is.
lol. legit just forfeit and pay the bringing the game into disrupte fine.
Kinda feeling that way at the moment. 
What do we need a ruckman for anyway? So he can palm it down to a midfielder who will then blaze away and turn it over immediately?
The season is shot, just pick Waterman.
1 Like
Oh ffs.
Why did we insist on not taking some talls in last yearâs draft!?
12 Likes
Is Bryanâs injury official?
Absolute â â â â -take if true. The week we could get him to debut and this happens. No fit ruckman on the list, youâd say this injury crisis bad luck but if it happens constantly how can it be?
Thank god we picked Gleeson and Clarke back up.
5 Likes
Time for Brasher to conduct an actual useful review.
A review into the spongey floors
2 Likes
Surely the better option wouldâve been to pay those blokes out and use the rookie list on actual rookies?
1 Like
But then who would we delist at the end of this year? Certainly not Cutler.
1 Like
Damn you Justin Crow!!
1 Like
Sack Quinn
3 Likes
Exclusive photo out of the Essendon rehabilitation centre today.
13 Likes
Why all the hamstring injuries of late?
Worth investigating.
All?
Caldwell, Bryan? Who else? Stuuza
Another thing Iâm absolutely sick of. Downgrading hacks to the rookie list. Pay them out and make actual use of the rookie list. What on earth in the point of having Gleeson and Clarke sitting there making us basically two men short on the list other than not having to pay them out?
I know we wouldnât have probably drafted a young ruckman since we have two already, but couldâve used it on a stop gap âbreak glass in case of emergencyâ type option like the Hawks did with Keegan Brooksby.
2 Likes
4 ruckmen was already overkill considering list size reductions and the number of KP players we drafted.
Guess we should have kept Crauford around.
Never mind Crauford.
Zac Clarke is the one we shouldnât have let slip.
What? What? Something I said?