Aside from the Waterman goal (where he was clearly being held but didn’t play through the whistle) I thought he was pretty good.
9 Likes
Credit where due, he was quite good tonight.
13 Likes
It seems I was a bit harsh on him.
He isn’t that soft after all. Has backed into quite a few marking contests over the last three games, and his kicking is actually pretty decent.
Hope he keeps it up.
7 Likes
If he keeps this up Lav wont get a look
1 Like
Let’s hope so.
2 Likes
He has a good kick to him doesn’t he? And he can defend. His footy iq is on the lower end and is definitely a confidence player.
1 Like
To be fair, that’s noting against LAV because he’s been a warrior but we need to move past him as Defensive 6.
1 Like
What does he offer?
He cannot play in defence, he doesn’t man up well at all, has he ever one a 1 v 1?
Delist
2 Likes
He hasn’t headbutted anyone on the last week, so there’s that.
1 Like
Do not want to see in AFL again this season
1 Like
Beaten in too many marking contests.
1 Like
He’s got a nice left foot kick.
He can’t defend though, and loses so many marking contests.
We must replace him, and I don’t trust the coaches to do it.
2 Likes
Scott LOVES him no chance
scott plays his favourites we know this not based on form
1 Like
No point discussing this plodder, genuine D grader with no upside, just hanging on to a spot. As Weidemen, Jones and other plodders before them Prior will play rain, hail or shine no matter what.
1 Like
And to think some thought he was an upgrade for Kelly
Problem there was coming from Kelly it would take six upgrades to get to a b grader
1 Like
We have enough list cloggers as is without bringing more in every fcking off season. Duursma excluded.
I’d rather play Laverde. At least you know he won’t shirk a contest. This bloke does continually.
10 Likes
Wasn’t the worst defender today
1 Like
Every forward that had him dragged him back to the goal square. Tells you everything you need to know.
2 Likes