Merrett (missed 1 game)
Parish (missed 3 games)
Langford
Redman
Martin
McGrath
Ridley
Shiel
Zerk
Setterfield (will fall out as miss most of the season from here)
He’s definietly not worth anything more than $700k. He’s achieved basically nothing other than developing himself into a good defender amongst other good defenders at EFC.
We should just be calling Ralph and the player managers bluff rather than compromise our own salary cap strategy.
theres at least 100 players now earning around that money, plenty of inferior players earning less, Bradley hill and isaac heeney to name a few. And ur telling me redman aint worth that money
Makes no difference. You asked me who I thought was worth $700k within the league.
Redman is a great defender, no question BUT he’s not worth more than $700k. It would literally be a form based contract only rather than form based + he’s achieved individual things (e.g. AA, B&F etc) as a defender.
700 K isnt even that much in today’s afl. I know it seems like the life savings to us normal blokes, when u have bradley hill being payed around 900k and ur trying to say redman isnt worth 700k, thats hilarious
I don’t care if it’s not much in today’s AFL. I don’t think he is worth anymore than $700k, and if that’s hilarious to you, then that’s entirely a matter for you.
Also, where does the Bradley Hill comparison come into it? He’s a midfielder/forward and Redman is a defender. And he’s won 3 premierships. Now that’s an hilarious comparison.
Shane Harvey vibes? It was said at the time that Sheeds thought it might be an opportunity to get Boomer over, but IIRC Shane shat the bed in his first week at Essendon…some sort of kerfuffle at the strippers at the southern end of King St.
Personally, I want every Blitzer who says to let Red Dog go banned. Saying that $750K is too much when Merrett is earning $700K is just nonsense. Who really knows what Zach gets paid. If you believe the football media, you’re a downright fool.
Is Redman worth more than Dawson? IMO no. Dawson is an absolute gun.