Australian Policies -- from 2025 Federal election

With Brandt gone it will be perhaps easier but I get your point.

Not that many policy areas in fact, if you take each sides policy as gospel. Problems arise when while Labor policy to stop coal mining is on the books, action is lacking. Same goes for refugees and many other things.

Greens need to re-appraise their foreign policies, in any case not sure AUKUS will survive Trump. None of the people I know in Defence in both US and Oz think that submarines can be made in timely manner. Unless Trump is nice it will get revisited, would be easier if Marles left the building.

1 Like

Lol
This was only in December
“The Albanese Labor government has approved four huge coal mine expansions in New South Wales and Queensland that will fuel over 850m tonnes of carbon emissions in their lifetime, which is equivalent to almost double Australia’s annual emissions”

4 Likes

In the HoR, sure.

They currently appear to hold balance of power in the senate, though. That is through the ALP doing unexpectedly well and not The Greens.

1 Like

It’s interesting.

Because if you look at Labor (under Andrews)……. The Greens were getting smashed in the polling, because Labor was implementing Greens policies.

1 Like

And how much of the profits of those coal mines is going back to the Government???

I dare say, none.

3 Likes

Maybe a more mixed ethnic mix in some of the old Lib seats.
To note that Laxale, the sitting ALP member for Bennelong, romped it in.
I’m not so sure that Coleman was that popular. He went missing on leave for a stretch of the Morrison Government, protected by Morrison , allegedly seriously ill, didn’t feature much in Opposition. Maybe the electorate had enough of him standing again and not giving way to new blood. I don’t know much about the candidates standing against him.
Some chatter about a backlash to the continued Morrison influence.
ADD
Absolute lunacy for the Libs to run with Constance in Gilmore. It’s a marginal South Coast seat and Constance carries a lot of baggage in the area.

Whatever gets me the most props.

2 Likes

They were on the cards in transition to renewables. Some of them substituted for the ones running down.
( Not that I’m not cynical )

1 Like

The big swing against the ALP in Calwell is being explained in part by the number of candidates.
Also, someone referred to an extraordinary number of informals.
ADD
As to the Vics not pulling their weight, we did it last time with big scalps ( Teals) Tudge in a by election and now Sukkar. Not much left, Tim Wilson isn’t any quality to cheer about.

1 Like

I would’ve thought the demographics of the Sydney teal seats and Goldstein quite similar. A bit perplexing the vastly different results.

Chinese-Australians still turning away from the Libs in big numbers. Big factor in Bennelong and to a lesser extent Chisholm.

1 Like

We can only hope AUKUS gets revisited. It’s about as viable as seven nuclear power plants………

2 Likes

Interesting to follow the Bandt contest . Very different postal results from booth to booth ?

2 Likes

And Labor has subsequently agreed to his border policies. The two parties are in lock step on unauthorised arrivals. If little Johnny’s policies were so bad why does Labor adopt them?

2 Likes

From memory, Wentworth has the greatest percentage of Jewish residents. Kingsford Smith doesn’t come close, is less affluent and has a sitting ALP member. I think the other Teals in Sydney were in more secular electorates ( and Sydney Catholic hierarchy tends to meddle less than the Melbourne one, shades of the old DLP under Mannix who are now Libs)
Goldstein, also with affluent pockets was under siege, not only in regard to the Jewish vote, but also Catholic hierarchy meddling. I’d say it’s closer to Kooyong than any Sydney Teal seat.
The Jewish Independent online posted the statements of candidates in the electorates with a number of Jewish voters. Spender’s letter to Penny Wong was very strongly worded. Daniel was moderate, more guarded, she refused to do a Yes/No to a questionnaire from a Jewish organisation and held back on some points,
But just my speculation. My Sydney sources that I rely on for a more informed view, are currently OS unfortunately.

FFS there is no such category as illegal arrivals of people.

2 Likes

Big Chinese population in Kooyong also. There was a matter regarding Chinese influence on voting in Kooyong that was referred to the relevant authorities.

Ok let’s call them unauthorised arrivals then.

Arriving by sea without a visa is considered an unauthorized entry and a violation of the Migration Act.

I think this is generally referred to as “pragmatic politics”.

The more important point is that we are still paying a significant price for Johnny’s largesse.

1 Like

It won’t be.
A lot more involved than just the subs and plenty of it is already underway.
If anything we are expanding our ties with the US. Marles is very, very pro US and defence. He will be running the show as long as Labor are in power

2 Likes

The vessel which enters without authorisation is the illegal entry, not the people on it. Those people are deemed to have not entered Australia, through a redefinition of Australian territory. They can’t be found here.
Go ahead and label all the Vietnamese boat people who were granted residence as illegals. Before the hammer went down on boat arrivals. The ones who arrive by air, gaming the visa system , together with those who overstay their visas or who breach their visa conditions (Brits galore clogging up the detention centres)

8 Likes