Are you actually ok?
Jesus chief, I’ve been pretty clear on this discussion that I don’t think boomers are to blame for a fair bit of what they cop. Read it back.
Cos at the moment you’re pretty much validating some theories.
their comprehension disappears when they’re arced up
I just want to know from which generation the people who decided to stop releasing Tazos came from.
That is where my anger will be directed.
3 Likes
boomer + x fr fr
Getting back to the political issues of the day which might impact on us, do we have a current Coalition as the Opposition to Government? Who are the Shadow Ministers to match those sworn in by the GG?
Do they have policies or common policies? Any clarity on nuclear?
1 Like
The Murdoch group of companies joining forces with Hancock Prospecting?
Might as well cut out the middle man.
1 Like
Based on what you posted @Chris_1993 Zoe Daniel is claiming an error by the AEC which is 14 x greater than the biggest error ever discovered in a recount where that error has over turned a result ….or 4 x larger than the greatest AEC error ever discovered in a recount in any election. So Zoe is claiming an error by the AEC of an historic unprecedented size across the history of Australian elections? Is this correct ?
I thought Nats were sticking to nuclear policy
Maybe she’s just claiming a recount because the bloke’s a massive twatwaffle.
I’m with her, as much as I think “teals” are a waste of space.
2 Likes
They have shifted. Nats still supportive of nuclear but now saying the moratorium on nuclear should be lifted and no longer saying the government should fund the construction of nuclear power plants. Apparently the Libs also moving to this less expensive policy position.
No.
There could (but note: I think very unlikely) be errors of similar or greater magnitude in counts where the margin is so large any error is of no consequence. For example, a 500 vote error in Aston (a former LIB safe seat, now held by ALP by >3%) is of no consequence. Mary Doyle would still lead by >7,000 votes. So, it never gets checked, and we never know if it is there or not.
But in the small sample of seats which have had a recount, yes, it would be an unprecedented level of error.
1 Like
If either had half a brain they’d point out that Labor has been spruiking our involvement in the nuclear industry for more than a decade.
We have to be involved. Even if it’s not (yet) at a power generation level, we need to sort our ■■■■ out in this area in the next three years.
The irony of all this is that Labor would love nuclear power too, but they don’t have the balls to say it.
1 Like
Won’t happen no matter how hard some people want it, fission power is now a political wedge issue and will never be implemented in this country, because renewable tech advancements will outpace its implementation
We can revisit when fusion happens
3 Likes
I’m not mad about that.
Doesn’t invalidate my position on Labor’s position though.
Labor? You mean diet LNP?
1 Like
The right wing party you have when you really want to vote for a right wing party but feel good about not voting for a right-er wing party.
2 Likes
Australia has twin renewables advantages in solar and wind power possibly unmatched in other countries.
3 Likes
In seats where there has been a recount, it would be a record error based on the information you posted. That is the qualifier I put in it. It would be the largest known error ever by the AEC?
Yes, by considerable margin.
But there won’t be a recount. They will reject Daniel’s request, just as they did Constance last election.
1 Like