Absolutely. Alleged serial sleaze bag who had prior warmings for harassment in his office. Given the way the victim was treated, you could understand why no-one would go public.
Why would the security guards not let him in without his pass to pick up his keys, but let him in to collect documents and remove them from the Ministerâs office?
AND
If he went from PH to partying , what happened to his pass?
Was he asked if he actually had his pass with him?
Loss of a pass is a serious security issue.
(He was sacked for a security branch)
Thanks for posting. The pics show her walking barefoot in PH, after the security desk, holding her very high heels.
So not stumbling all over the place in her stilettos.
Bullwinkle thinks you mean more specifically âtrustworthy upstanding and honest, and convincing as a witnessâ, where you write âlegitâ.
Can someone confirm if his girlfriend was waiting or calling from his house? If this is correct, why would he need his keys?
In the interview, when he was asked why he left Higgins behind at PH, he said something to the effect that, after he had picked up on the calls from the GF, he needed to get home to her at their mutual abode.
so he tailors his reasons to the audience. So why would Minister Reynolds be most convinced by him wanting access to Parliament House so he could âdrink whiskyâ? Obviously it worked because she backed him up all the way and threw Higgins under the bus.
Maybe she didnât like whisky as much as Reynolds did.
Because they are very slack
Just looking very drunk in her bare feet
To note that none of Lerhmannâs evidence has been given under oath. He is however on the record, in a letter to Senator Reynolds, that he did not inform the security guards at PH that his purpose was to collect documents . The letter was written following his sacking for a security breach, in which he acknowledged it was a serious breach to enter the office after hours.
Such a strange case, they both seem to be lacking credibility in a lot of areas.
Such poor form from that juror that ruined the trial, would have been great to get an answer from civilians who have sat through all the evidence.
the juror
Well, they are, or were, both Liberals.
Karama is a â â â â â Rupert, Peter.
Andrews government bans print advertising in Herald Sun and The Age | Herald Sun
i for one know that if there is vital safety information that i need to know about urgently, the quickest and most effective way to receive it is the following day on printed material that i need to go out and purchase.
How else are you supposed to find out about the fake pandemic?
Wait, they actually publish news somewhere in that Harvey Norman catalogue?
Itâs good we have agencies like the ANAO to review program and policy implementation. Next step is to make sure failure of poor governance and accountability isnât repeated and that those responsible are held to account.