Brad Scott - yeah, whatever (Part 3)

This is neither the time or the place for this thought of thinking!

2 Likes

This is a big issue we have, made even worse by the fact that the majority of them are on really long term contracts

3 Likes

IMO Rutten was out of his depth especially for the Essendon senior gig. There is a lot of issues to dodge on top of the standard coaching stuff. Rutten was drowning and we needed to make the move. The way we went about it (leaving it until end of season, chasing clarko etc) was another problem but it doesn’t cover the fact that Rutten wasn’t fit to coach our side. Many people make good assistant coaches but not a lot can take the senior mantle.

Go back and watch post game pressers in 2022 to see some of the issues he had. Two years is long enough to form a position on a coach. I’m not really a fan of B. Scott but he has worked through a lot of our back of house concerns. He would be great is a role such as ā€˜head of coaches’ or maybe back at AFL house.

1 Like

…just get through the next 18 mths - play the youth - and identify and develop 3-4 stars. More than anyone’s done in last 20 years

1 Like

It wouldn’t have mattered if we had Norm Smith, Clarko, Matthew’s or anyone else between 2012-22… The club was broken, distracted and its culture broken apart by circumstances beyond what the coach could handle or manage. It was a whole of club issue that was the problem. Worsfold, Rutten or anyone else didn’t have a chance. The club wasn’t supporting them and they were set up to fail.

Thsts why things might (I said might) be different this time. A whole of club commitment to rebuild from the ground up. No more quick fixes. That’s the necessary approach and for the first time in a decade, Essendon actually has a hope of breaking out of its malaise with good management from here.

6 Likes

That’s how i feel as well the club,players all seem to be behind this new regime under Brad and co

1 Like

Pretty difficult when you don’t give a rats clacker and your hearts not in it. At least Ben tried his hardest to change things, he was jus surrounded by idiots

I’ll never hold that against him, the eagles jerk can go and get farked though

4 Likes

*Except for the bloke who got stitched up by the AFL.

2 Likes

It’s somewhat surprising you haven’t been banned more TBH…

3 Likes

@centipede2 must be David King

3 Likes

And if you quoted my whole post it was 46 players in the last five years which is a complete list. You are living in a fantasy world if you can do anymore over a 5 year period. Now it’s a matter of getting more talent onto the list.

2 Likes

There’s a difference between ā€œturning over the listā€ and turning over a big group of players.

Of the team what played the 2021 final, 14 of them are still on the list. So a lot of the core group are unchanged. Until Stringer this year we haven’t really actively traded out a player who had played significant senior games (seems like we wanted to keep Mass and BZT)

A lot of our list changes in recent years have been us simply delisting draftees as soon as their first contract ended, most after not playing a single senior game. It hasn’t been us changing anything materially about the core senior group

Gown
Jok
Ham
Mossie
Eyre
Brand
Lord
McDonagh
Cahill
Johnson
Hibberd
Voss
Davey

13 Likes

nothing will change until we get rid of the senior players who cant handle an ounce of pressure once the pointy end of the season comes around. And theyre all on long term deals so we’re kind of ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– 

5 Likes

Who are you referring to ?

They need 3-4 phenomenal players to lead them and we just don’t have them……

mcgrath, redman draper etc

Players will do what they have to, in order to get paid.

Not sure I have seen much passion in the Team since Hooker and Hurley retired.

1 Like

I don’t think anyone should claim that we have been in the process of a mini-rebuild or rebuild on the run using list turnover numbers as evidence.

  1. Teams turnover lists normally, we haven’t been that much outside of the norm
  2. The reason why we have had so much turnover is we have not drafted or developed players to the standards required. Meaning there is more dead weight on the list/more players to cut
  3. There has been no big names/mature bodies that have been traded out for additional draft picks (Stringer doesn’t count for me on this due to the little return we received).
  4. I’ve seen no evidence of kids being played ahead of seniors players at AFL level throughout BDBs time. The kids who have played have all earned their position based on VFL form or pre-season training.
5 Likes

I’ll bite. Rutten.

Other clubs are taking advantage of Free Agency, by actively letting players leave…. So they can get a first round pick.

We’ve had multiple opportunities to do this, and chose not to.

7 Likes