Brad Scott - yeah, whatever (Part 3)

Yeah, it just dawned on me the minimum length of contract there is 5 years

Bloody hell

Scott going nowhere. Coaching and development may or may not be best in breed, but we’ve been in most games all season… that’s a pass mark for coaching.

We lose games because there’s not enough quality under pressure, to close out games. It’s not coincidence that the close games we win are down to Durham and Merrett getting plenty of the ball in the last few mins (see Freo game).

If we had no regular winners in their position, then you’d have an argument for poor development. We have plenty… but you also need your early picks to show something, and they never do. Rather than pointing the finger at development, (Durham, Caldwell have developed), point the finger at recruitment (Tsatas, Cox, Perkins have never shown the mental aptitude to deliver regularly under pressure - conversely Caddy as a post-Dodoro era pick, has). Development managed to get something out of a basketcase in Wright, even if it was just for a season. Caldwell and Draper have overcome their injuries - sports science is ok… it’s the list that needs an overhaul

3 Likes

I stupidly went along on Saturday night and I spent a lot of time watching how Redman positions himself when behind the ball, and man it is mind boggling. He pays his direct opponent no respect at all. He was happy to give 20-40m leg rope on multiple occasions. It’s like, mate, you’re Mason Redman not peak Jeremy McGovern. It’s alarming.

1 Like

I wonder if that’s to be ā€œdangerousā€ or if he is simply out there not adhering to the game plan

1 Like

Yeah I mean if he was a spare I could understand it but in the situations I’m referring to he certainly wasn’t that. It would be interesting to know what the instructions are from the coaching group though yeah.

Who was he playing on?

The occasional long-bomb goal buys him a lot of goodwill. He has two for the year. His actual positioning and one-on-one defending is really poor. He is playing behind the ball because he doesn’t have the footy IQ to play any other position, and is on a bloated long-term contract because our list management team blinked when Adelaide came sniffing.

4 Likes

I’m a little concerned. I’ve always thought if we had a good run with injuries we would play finals at least. Turns out that’s not the case. So many players are just not in good form? We did improve on last year so at least we have that.

1 Like

Judging by his positioning, nobody.

But from memory he cycled through Jed Walter and Bailey Humphrey mostly. Maybe Holman at times. I was watching from level 3 and was just focusing on the orange/yellow jumper that he was giving 30 odd metres of leg rope too, not so much who it was.

I didn’t go to the game so have no idea but maybe they were just trying to drag Redmen out of position? I don’t think his opponent did much all game

1 Like

For mine it’s not a case of needing to flog the players in the offseason or get them to try harder. The coaching largely got that right this season.

In Q4 on the weekend we had the ball in our half 84% of the time, we led scoring shots, I50’s and contested ball. We out worked the opposition and thus the effort was there.

This story has played out in about ten games this year where we matched or bettered the opposition in key stats that indicate the effort is there. Only really a couple of games where it clearly wasn’t.

The problem is class, to get reward for effort.

  • we don’t have a key forward who can take a contested mark
  • we don’t have any genuinely good small forwards.
  • we severely lack kicking skills in the midfield and defence.
  • we don’t have much line breaking speed-
  • we lack genuine game winners that stand up under pressure -

Coaching can’t fix all those skill and talent issues.

33 Likes

Yep. This is why I don’t get the ā€œIt’s not a talent issue. The talent is thereā€ crew.

Of course like everything it’s multi faceted to some degree but it’s absolutely still a talent issue in the areas you’ve identified.

5 Likes

It’s because it’s a great delusion to buy into. If you believe we have the talent and it’s just about trying harder then you’re only one spray or team building camp away from premierships.

Acknowledging we don’t have the talent means years of work to rectify. Even without a rebuild, just addressing our current weaknesses would take multiple off seasons to fix.

8 Likes

Another massive issue is that we designed a game plan that exposes our weaknesses.

I mean, who in their right mind would look at the team with the meekest key forward and worst small forward stocks in the league and think:

"I’ve got it, let’s bomb it to the big guy and let the smalls feast.

It is absolutely, in part, a coaching issue.

1 Like

Merrett, Calders and Durham are all above average kicks for midfielders.
I genuinely dont think thats the issue anymore.

I think our set ups, which include defensive set ups, are league worst.
Our coaches have no farking idea.

Imo.

You can have both.
I don’t think we have great talent.

But we have enough talent to be able to kick 3.6 in a quarter instead of 1.9. You cannot tell me that if I take Draper and Stringer out to a paddock that they don’t kick 50% of their shots from the same distance they missed in front of a crowd.
There are mental demons that hold us back and it’ll take quite an individual to work their way through it. Especially at a club that gets our results.

You are correct though. Our deficiencies will take longer than an off-season to fix. And we may create more problems along the way. Fitness has been a major problem. We haven’t fixed it yet, but we are better in that area than last year.

3 Likes

I’m not as concerned as some about the ā€˜locked in’ core of senior players even though I agree they all have limitations. For clarity in this instance I’m referring to the Langford, Parish, Redman, McGrath, McKay group. These guys are fine as a mid-tier in a top 4 team but at the moment are in our 1-10 players. We can overthink things too much - we don’t need to get rid of those players IMO, they are an important core but we clearly need a better top tier of talent above them which as pointed out will require at least 4-5 acquisitions of high calibre players through draft\trade\free agency.

Agree that Brad Scott is working with sub-optimal cattle and must be given time to exert influence over playing list and culture.

7 Likes

This idea that mental fragility isn’t a talent issue, is just laughable.

Seriously, there’s not a lot of difference between skills and physical application of most players picked in the first round. There is some differences, here and there depending on strengths and positions they play…. But overall not a lot of difference.

Their mental application in high pressure situations is what separates these players in quality. It’s the differences between the greats and a spuds

1 Like

Scott’s on a hiding to nowhere. It just feels like he, and the club, feel the list was not far from where it needed to be, and that a couple of years to lift standards, effort, fill some gaps, complement the list, might work out.

It seems the club has an eye on a finals win level (still), and it’s a massive mistake. We exist to win premierships, and everything else means f all. The list simply isn’t competitive enough and needs a massive change up. Scott surely has to see this, now that he’s had two years to get the best out of certain players and seeing that it’s not there.

It feels like do or die time. Overhaul the list as much as possible in this next window, or enjoy another nothing season in 2025.

4 Likes

Which is what I was getting at with

I do t think you can turn Zaharakis into Joel Selwood. It’s an inherent trait, it’s apparent from day 2 and we don’t have enough of it.

4 Likes