For next years draft thats fine
I thought you meant trade out players to get picks for this years draft
Whatâs another 10 years 
Says who?
The media?
Besides we can trade for future picks
1 Like
No one.
Stringer wins the game for the Giants. Great âcultureâ trade out.
Got to keep in blokes with private school backgrounds dont we. VC Andrew McGrath
Congratulations Brad Scott on another great decision you flog.
The people who dont want to rebuild cant say anything about this. @Finding_Nino
1 Like
I have no issue with Brad forcing stringer out. It was the right call. For both the club and stringer himself
What doesnât make sense is, why would you play him every game and then force him out?
12 Likes
Why is the list management suddenly on Scott?
2 Likes
Really? You can mount a case against Scott in a number of areas, but trading out Stringer is the one weâre going with?
1 Like
To ensure Stringer played enough games to trigger the clause in his contract to get another year automatically. This means he ends the season under contract for next season meaning he canât walk for nothing, he needs to be traded.
3 Likes
TBF he pretty well walked for nothing. Did we even use the pick we got for him?
1 Like
For Scott to have any credibility at all he must drop Perkins next game.
5 Likes
He still wont have any
2 Likes
That ship has long sailed.
1 Like
Aaron Francis and E Tsatas!
We got pick 53 from GWS.
On the night, we bundled picks 40, 46 and 53 and sent them to Brisbane for picks 35, 37 and 58.
With 58, we picked Unwin.
2 Likes
Correct. Both of those would be better coaches than Brad
1 Like
The only experienced coach available that i would get is Nathan Buckley.
And I donât think he wants to coach Essendon.
Rather the âheatâ be on us getting great assistants and then hopefully seeing Rosa and Obrien pluck some draft and trade gems.
Scott might end up being caretaker, or when he assembles the team he might surprise everyone. As long as players want in under him is the main thing.
I donât get the rag on the âgame planâ. Someone tell me how they should be playing?
Wouldnât be interested in John Longmire?
Iâd happily have him or Buckley. I think they both have the right mixture of authoritative coaching that our group needs while still being tactically sound.
From what they were they saying on the Sunday Footy Show Longmire is not really inrested in coaching said Simpson is the more keen to have a job next year
Longmire is burnt out and will want a few years in the media heâll get the Tassie job imo
I probably wouldnât bother changing coach for Simpson, although I wouldnât know enough about him and his game style to know if it would be worth it.
I want us to change coach for someone with a strong history, if not then clean out our assistants and bring in the best we can.
Our assistant coaches are honestly abysmal.
I donât rate Brad tactically but itâs pretty clear he garners respect from the players. If we can get the best tactical minds to pair with him it would probably be ok.
1 Like