ok, me too. i got home from the game, admittedly only seeing the first half, saw the langford thread blew up and had a bit of a wtf moment. thought he presented well, seemed to get to some good spots, often unrewarded. not a great game, but passable i thought. who knows.
Look, we SHOULD pump them. SHOULD!!!
We should have also beaten Geelong and Collingwood in the end.
I have no doubt that on paper and even when we play properly, we are probably the 3rd best team in the league at the moment, but something isn’t clicking.
I’d play one of our defenders on him.
Now whether that’s McKenna or Saad or Ambrose, I don’t really mind…and you could decide on the day depending on other match-ups (you know, if we were a team that did that).
Lloyd is so important to the way they play, it’s ridiculous.
They want the ball in his hands coming out of defence and up the wing because his disposal is friggin’ mint.
They look for him.
If we could shut that down then we stop their run and we cause turnovers not just though blocking him, but through forcing them to use players they don’t want to deliver the ball.
And I get that that is supposed to be Baguley’s job, but in this case I don’t think he’s up to it.
Lloyd will run him off his feet in a quarter.
Edit: Also, he doesn’t tackle. Like…ever. So I’d love to see how that works for them with McKenna or Saad.
I didn’t expect us to win either of these games. Apart from the St Kilda game we’ve won what we should have. If we lose to Sydney then it might be time to panic.
The Swans aren’t as bad as their ladder position suggests, but we had their measure last year comfortably. I also believe we are building a bit more ticker than some are giving us credit for.
Would be a good week for Clarke’s dodgey calf to come good but.