Changes Vs Priority Picks 'R' Us

Yep anything other than obliterating them by 10+ goals is unacceptable. I want us to be hungry Gold Coast 2011 style

4 Likes

15 goal first term

Losing last night not good but looking at the fixture we are more than capable of winning every game.

The changes have never been more obvious, weā€™ve missed Parish.

We are gonna get mediaeval on this mob

Geez, everyone coming to a consensus? Thatā€™s a change

Nah, make him immediately start his repayment scheme.

He owes us.

no changes for mine.

1 Like

Out: watsons right boot
In: jarmans right boot

2 Likes

Parish in is almost a certainty.

1 Like

Parish has to come in
Hooker obvious in for Smack if fit

Can we find a way to give Begley a go?
Jobe? eeeeeeeeeeeeehhhhhhhhhā€¦

In Parish, Hooker, Dea
Out Langford, McKernan, Gleeson

and maybe Begley for Howlett,

Ok now that i have calmed down a touch from last night i would go with

Out: watson,smack, howlett
In: hooker, parish, bird

1 Like

In: the russian to deck everyone.

I think Darren Jarmanā€™s right foot is otherwise disposed supporting its ownerā€™s ~150kg frame.

3 Likes

Or Green?

Ins: Hooker Parish
Outs: Mckernan Green

Iā€™m still ā– ā– ā– ā– ā– ā–  we didnā€™t go hard for Jeff Garlett! He would have been great in our forward line.

1 Like

In - Hooker, Parish.
Out - McKernan, Howlett.

Laverde should be ready to play, obviously will go into VFL for a few games. Once ready, Iā€™d imagine heā€™d be part of our best 22.

Need to make a statement this week after the debacle last night.

6 Likes

Change the heading to

Essendon vs the f*cking meth heads

If there was ever a team which look like a bunch of meth heads, itā€™s Brisbane. Led by Mitch Robinson

3 Likes