Was he forced to though? Didn’t Barham say he chose the church over the club? Sounds like he was given an ultimatum, and if so it could fall under unfair dismissal.
Passed on $850k apparently as CEO, but reportedly earns more from the church.
That he “resigned”. Hell argue that due to the conversations which took place that he felt he had no other option but to resign, which is constructive dismissal and will open up the door for not only an adverse action claim through the fair work commission but also the relevant human rights tribunals
I kinda wonder what the church will make of that. Probably not much, cos I imagine that he’s a generous donor, and organisations make exceptions for that sort of person.
So the Archbishop stays and contines to practice in an organisation that was responsible for raping and molesting children and subsequently covering it up but the Essendon CEO resignation is too upsetting he’s relinquishing his membership. Is that right?
Story they just broke doesn’t even get a mention on the front page and is relegated to the “AFLW” subsection - while a new Thorburn story is the main article on the front page
Is getting a new president going to fix this ■■■■ show? Fk me, what a rabble. Next minute Scott will resign, and Hird will be back - maybe all of this was Sheedy’s cunning plan to get his man in the job!