That’s up to the person who was sacked.
1 Like
You don’t need unity, it just happens. There is always infighting when there is no success, because people want success. When you have success, there is no need for it.
He wasn’t sacked.
1 Like
He was. He’s been replaced, his position wasn’t made redundant.
Where does it say sacked?
Maybe they wanted to get rid of him earlier but because of ‘complications’ relating back to prior regimes it wasn’t feasible 
What would you call it when you’ve been told your employment is ending and then someone else fills your role?
Anyway, I have no inside info so probably not in a position to be commenting.
2 Likes
Does it?
“Hey your role is no longer required and we will be distributing your role responsibilities amongst the remaining staff as part of a broader restructure” = redundant
“You are ■■■■ and your performance wasnt up to it, laters” = sacked
2 Likes
I hope Wife #4 is keeping a close eye on him…
Mrs Fox the Third is the current fortunate lady, though you can never discount the need for a Fourth or Fifth, like Rupert.
1 Like
That’s why you introduce people to your ‘current wife’…
Surely you dont think Dodoro left of his own accord?
Not at all. But I think they came to an understanding. It got messy. But i don’t think he was “sacked”.
He stepped away and consistent with transition plan Rosa stepped up.
It’s more complicated than what it seems. It’s not a simple termination or parting of ways. Footy clubs are funny places…
He’s gone now and Rosa can take control of the task he was employed to do…
You don’t think?
I would not dare.
1 Like
Yes. But if the complication is because people at the club had separate business deals etc then it’s an indictment on all.
1 Like
I love this from the 7NEWS article linked by @Heffsgirl, above :
It has been reported that the Bombers have offered a “six-figure payout” to Dodoro but Dodoro wanted a bigger number.
$100,000 would be a “six-figure payout”. I suspect the Dodo wanted another zero on it. I wonder what he got in the end di andare a fanculo.
From what I understand, the settlement occurred after the end of clubs financial year. Take note in the clubs financials…….
Either the club allowed for an expense (current liability) to cover it off in the 2024 FY or it might be listed as a contingent liability in the notes to the accounts.
It will be interesting to dig into the reports to see if there’s an unexplained increase in expenditure somewhere within the reports. It has to be contained somewhere, question is how and the nature of timing.
A task for the forensic accountants on here!
3 Likes