Do you think he would ever contemplate coming to us now? Doubt it
1 Like
Im ok with this.
I wanted Dunkley as much as anyone, but not at any price. It would have been 2 X top 10 picks.
Back ourselves to find someone better at 6,7,8 or next yearās first round.
Weāre stacked with picks and we can build from here.
Dunkley isnāt Danger or Judd. Glad we didnāt get bent over.
3 Likes
Sackable in my opinion
I hear Mitch Hibberd goes alright
2 Likes
Bryce Gibbs, Tim Kelly and Orazio Fantasia say āhiā
I donāt know the answer to that.
We canāt predict the future.
Iām just glad we didnāt pay a stupid price, which is what the Bulldogs list manager was intimating that it would take.
1 Like
I love the idea of Dunkley but not for two top #10 picks
3 Likes
Papley and many others say hi back
Dogs: āWe arenāt trading Dunkley.ā
And they didnāt.
1 Like
DUNKLEY- i want more more midfield time.Please trade me
DOGS- Recruit Trelor.
Sorry,doesnāt make sense.
5 Likes
Hind done.
1 Like
Hatley walks to psd.
why didnāt gws accept deal?
Why do we have a thread about the Bulldogsā fourth fifth best mid?
Gurge.
future second for caldwell is a great deal
1 Like
Except we gave up Portās 2020 2nd rounder as well. Probably fair, but not THAT much of a bargain.
1 Like
and our salary cap would be in pretty good shape as well.
not taking dunkley probably helps us get another good pick next year.
not exactly what we wantedā¦but probably what we needed.
1 Like
Probably didnāt need the draft pick which was pretty high
ARCHIE PERKINS
2 Likes
ohh didnāt realise 29 as well oh well it probably gets eaten up in brand bid anyway
Essendon sent pick No.29 and its future second-round selection to GWS in exchange for Caldwell, pick No.44 and No.74.
could have given it back to us or the cats.