Ess V. Pies - Your votes

  1. Stanton

2 . Heppell

  1. Hooker

3 Hooker
2 Heppell
1 Baguley

With honourable mentions to Stanton and Fletcher

  1. The formerly much maligned Stanton
  2. Baguley
  3. Fletch.
  1. Hooker
  2. Heppell
  3. Stanton

Stanton
Heppell
Hibberd

Stanton
Hooker
Hepp

  1. B.Stanton
  2. C.Hooker
  3. D.Heppell

Fletcher
Hooker
Heppell

Stanton
Fletcher
Heppell

liked Zerret, Bags, Clunk and Dempsey

3 Hooksy - staggering to think the club wanted to trade this guy.
2 Stanton
1 Bags

  1. Stanton
  2. Hooker
  3. Heppell
  1. Heppell
  2. Stanton
  3. Ummm… Hibberd.

3 Heppell
2 Hooker
1 Fletcher

Baguley, Stanton & Hurley were ok too

Hepp
Stants
Hurley

3. Stanton (scored 50% of our goals and worked hard all day) 2. Hooker (rarely beaten) 1. Heppell (few turnovers but was the only one who seemed to give a shit most of the time)

This

Agree.

  1. Fletcher - just about the only player who played 4 solid quarters consistently.
  2. Heppell - hauled us back into the game in Q2
  3. Stanton - superb gut running and was BOG at half time. Seemed to run out of a little steam afterwards.

3 Baguley
2 Fletcher
1 Hooker

  1. Stanton
  2. Hooker
  3. Hep
  1. Heppell - Unlike most of our players worked hard and ran all day. Another elite level performance.

  2. Hooker - Shat on Cloke all day and saved our defence many times. Would’ve been flogged without him.

  3. Stanton - Had a red hot crack all day and hit the scoreboard when we needed it.

Baggers stiff.

  1. Hooker
    2, Heppell
  2. Stanton