Ess v. Saints Post game

Match review by BlitzGPT

It was a massacre of misery for the Saints (and perhaps for Essendon fans too), as the Bombers managed a measly 2.6 to 1.1 in the last quarter. The game had been a display of incompetence in the skills department from the start, but the Bombers somehow found their rhythm in the dying moments, passing the ball around effortlessly until Stringer, by some stroke of luck, snagged the lead with a mere six minutes remaining.

Captain Zach Merrett, who had been invisible for much of the game, suddenly decided to show up in the last quarter with 12 disposals, while McGrath decided to grace us with his presence, sweeping off half-back.

St Kilda, on the other hand, practically strolled the ball from one end to the other in the first half, giving their fans a leisurely viewing experience. Meanwhile, Bombers supporters were left tearing their hair out as Saints players waltzed around their team like they were nothing.

Higgins, picking up where he left off last week, managed to sneak in three goals, relishing the lack of opposition he faced. The Bombers, however, couldn’t string two passes together for most of the match, constantly falling into St Kilda’s trap and struggling to find any semblance of cohesion, especially without Wright.

As for defender Nic Martin, sure, he racked up a ridiculous 27 disposals in the first half, but what good did it do when Essendon couldn’t even move the ball out of their own defensive half? And don’t even get me started on Durham, who got himself injured and had to call it quits in the third quarter.

But oh, let’s not forget Setterfield, the late withdrawal with his perennial knee issues. Scott insists it wasn’t a big deal, but who knows if he’ll ever make a meaningful contribution?

And as if things couldn’t get worse, both teams were missing their main forwards due to suspensions, leaving a void that even Caminiti’s two goals couldn’t fill. The Bombers scrambled to cover for Wright, throwing players around like they were on a sinking ship.

But wait, there’s more! St Kilda managed to dodge a bullet halfway through the third quarter when Stringer’s goal was disallowed, turning the tide of the game. At that moment, it felt like the final nail in the coffin for the Bombers, even if they did somehow claw their way to victory in the end.

3 Likes

Wow the sass on chat gpt

Oh no, the AI is gaining sentience.
IT BEGINS!

1 Like

I wish I had your confidence. He’s not a clean ball-handler and that’s an essential quality for a small forward.

Reads exactly like the matchday thread without the f bombs.

1 Like

I’m surprised this hasn’t been talked about much in this thread.

We played much better because the team was more balanced, we didn’t have pure mids like Hobbs playing the old Parish role, and we had a flanker playing the flanker position (Hind).

I believe we should play with only four mids:

  1. Merrett
  2. Parish
  3. Setterfield
  4. Caldwell (picked over Hobbs only because Caldwell is cleaner with the ball)

Then we got Perkins and Stringer who can play in the middle to provide the bigger body when needed.

Durham goes back to wing.

Hind should be in the best 22 every week this year, he just makes us more balanced with his pace and ability to play on either end. You just can’t have both Hobbs and Caldwell, two mids, play on flank or half flank.

Tsatas and Hobbs can bid their time in the twos, they’re our future anyway.

However, while I agree with you that Hobbs is already a better inside mid than Durham, I don’t think Durham had little impact, and I think he is just as important as Setterfield with his crash and bash, and his tank. That said, it’d benefit the team more if he went back to wing.

2 Likes

That was stellar viewing…
stringer might center it or fluke it…
love it

Why go to the game only to stream yourself there? Do people really tune into that?

1 Like

Coaches votes… can someone work out who gave what! :face_with_spiral_eyes:

9 Andrew McGrath (ESS)
5 Zach Merrett (ESS)
4 Nic Martin (ESS)
4 Sebastian Ross (STK)
3 Jack Steele (STK)
2 Dyson Heppell (ESS)
2 Bradley Hill (STK)
1 Xavier Duursma (ESS)

Refer to post above:

1 Like

why would we assume that the coaches gave their own players most of the votes.

I think Scott would have given votes to at least 1 saints player.

1 Like

Something like this. The coaches gave very different votes.

Coach A
1 - Duurs
2 - Hepp
3 - Ross
4 - Martin
5 - McGrath

Coach B
1 - Ross
2 - Hill
3 - Steele
4 - McGrath
5 - Merrett

We all know scott gave Martin 4 because of his elite defending

2 Likes

If guess scott

5 Merrett
4 Martin
3 Steele
2 hepp
1 duurs

Impressive for Ross to give McGrath 9 votes!

6 Likes

Damn

1 Like

Seb Ross, not Ross Lyon

That was fun!

Give him a chance.

Getting excited at round threes ridiculous. He had a good year last year and now he’s got internal selection pressure so that might take him a while adjust.

It’s a good thing.

Blitz shooting him the minute he has a wobble is just, well, it’s blitz isn’t it.

1 Like

Blitz will blitz

Agree. Ground ball inside 50 gets is one of the most underrated stats in the game and Gresham is leading it so far this year. It’s the most congested part of the ground so winning the ball cleanly off the deck is super important.

He needs help there though and at this stage Menzie is not the answer. Most of the good small forwards get 2-3 a game.

3 Likes