Ok, now, I could be dumb and missing the point but how is his form of religion, power and control any different to what the alleged regime in Iran? Aside from the obvious Christian /Muslim.
11 Likes
1 Like
God is on his side!!!
I know this because he said so.
3 Likes
Google has changed his title from Secretary of Defence to Secretary of War.
Is Google being clever or do they change titles when the country is at war (like Commander-in-Chief)
I think it is a stuff up. Trump has changed it from the Department of Defence to the Department of War. But I don’t think the cabinet minister’s title can technically be changed without congress’ approval.
1 Like
fark me heggers is a braindead warmongering alcoholic sycophantic fruitloop.
imagine not understanding the hypocrisy of calling on a holy crusade to fight Iran criticised for being full of religious extremists.
7 Likes
So… which of these two countries are we allied with? And why?
5 Likes
Depending on your taste in medieval armour and sword design the crusaders look cooler? Of course it’s all tatts and hairshirts these days so not quite as relevant
2 Likes
Let’s not pretend they don’t do that ■■■■.
Because they do.
But still yikes.
The idea of holding ‘the good guys’ to a higher standard has completely gone.
2 Likes
You really need dark mode!
3 Likes
This is actually pretty grim.
Does Lebanon not have a right to exist, nor do they have any defensive measures?
Another round of ‘negotiations’ where the US/Israel can’t be trusted.
7 Likes
1 Like
I don’t actually use X or Truth, so Trump tweets are usually ones that others have captured.
4 Likes
He wants biblical law, but he doesn’t want to listen to the pope and White House minions threaten the pope’s delegates.
1 Like
Just checking whether biblical = sharia?
9 Likes
Talmudic law would be bad enough.
No pig products, like Islam
No seafood that doesn’t have scales
Unable to do anything from Friday dusk to Saturday dusk
All my knowledge comes from Michener’s The Source…and living in Jewish neighbourhoods for half my life.
1 Like
That article is FAR too light on details to have any idea idea of what happened. Any of the following are possible:
- the researcher was innocent or guilty of …. spying, regular crimes, etc
- Law Enforcement was either inappropriately or appropriately invasive in questioning and investigating
- The researcher either committed suicide, accidentally fell, or was thrown off by collaborators or law enforcement
It could literally be any of the above.
2 Likes
None of those things are great, though. And several seem apologist.