Yeah Selwood played mostly on the wing and he and Dangerfield were on fire. It looks their midfield will be working a lot better this season with Ablett playing forward. Obviously thatās just based on a practice match, but it seemed to click.
Thatās fine in theory but according to the training watches we spent the summer practising kicking to a grid 20m out straight in front and I think that is largely what we got during the jlt.
I found it odd at how much Parish and Langford were managed in the 2nd game. Getting them primed with McGrath as the young brigade would have been a nice thing to see.
Iāve become less and less concerned as the days go by and we get closer to round 1, We didnāt play either game to win which is comforting and annoying at the same time.
I wouldnāt say that Iām concerned - but I am definitely less bullish than I was before the JLT started.
Hopefully the JLT shows the players that they canāt afford to rock up and expect to win, and that they actually need to work hard. Iāll give the whole team the benefit of the doubt for now.
Round One last year against Adelaide where we had that comeback win in the last quarter - I think it was glossed over that we seriously stank it up for the first three quarters. Then that form ran into the first 8 rounds or so before Neeld got the flick.
From what I saw our forwards were leading to pockets and our mids would kick it to 20m in front of goal where 3 geelong defenders would play rock paper scissors to see who would take the uncontested mark.
Iām concerned. Our gameplan looked like it did at the start of 2018, in that we defended from half way and not the forward press and our forward structure was all over the place. Too often we ran through the middle and had stringer 1 on 3 or Tippa as our only forward with 2 to beat.
It also seemed like we didnt have an answer for the loose man in defence (again).
Iām concerned that the club is calling for us to be patient already. Iāve already had 15 years of impatience! Thereās no time like the present dammit!
Iām on the record as saying that JLT form is irrelevant, so no Iām not concerned. Still, I would have liked to see more goals from marks inside 50. I think we scored one goal in JLT 2 from a mark inside 50, and that was a sneaky one out the back (Myers).
Lack of marking inside 50 is a symptom of one or more of the following: slow ball movement (allowing defenders to get back), poor kicking inside 50, poor leading patterns from the forwards. From what I saw Iād tend to blame the leading patterns. It seems that only our āunglamorousā forwards (Brown, Bags) actually lead to the right places. Once Razz finds his touch heāll provide a target as well. The elephant (giraffe?) in the room here is Joey, whose leading was poor, but all heās trying to do right now is get through four quarters.