I think you’d have been on your own there. Most Blitzers would have preferred the top 10 pick over the future pick associated with a team who’d been in finals the previous three seasons including two top 4.
Anyway, as I said I don’t think the issue was the picks but development and injuries/injury management.
Cook was a great junior.
But he has been an incredibly slow burn. Barely had injuries but even through 2021 and 2022, Adelaide barely prioritised him ahead of others when they could have. Played him as a sub, did well without smashing it at SANFL, but definitely could have played ahead of Brodie Smith in 2022 given where they were in their development.
A lot wouldhate sitting through the Tsatas development. This one would be painful.
Also…
Collingwood weren’t trading a future first for one in 2000. The ‘why didn’t we trade it into the future’ trope comes up often. It was the 2000 draft. Very few clubs were trading into that draft with very little U18s footy to go by for a future first that would have far more data and scouting available.
We need to move on from the 2020 draft and its permutations. It wasn’t a normal draft and hasn’t had typical draft results.
The 2020 draft had 2 AAs, 1 in the squad of 40 (1 B&F but he’s already counted). The 2019 draft had 5 AAs, 6 in the squad of 40 (incl 4 B&Fs already counted) and 1 B&F. The 2021 draft already has 2 AAs, 3 in the squad of 40 (2 B&Fs already counted.
We lucked out and got compo picks in the worst draft possible.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s the worst draft results as far as games per player by the end of the decade.
Across 2018 to 2022, Francis, Clarke, Cox, Perkins and Hobbs all good rising star nominations. So let’s wait and see this can translate to success down the line.
History says it means nothing. Many good players never win a rising star nomination, just like many average players win a nomination or even the award itself.