Very good pick-up. So that would mean 3 outs would be required. Ridley traded and 2 delistings does it.
Yeah itâs going to be interesting if we donât cut anyone else contracted.
Nguyen would be a no brainer for me to extend, but as a Cat B that means nothing in regards to list spots.
Iâd also hold onto Gerreyn and Cox
Edwards has shown a bit, but at his age I have him behind those two.
If we could only keep one of the three (Edwards, Cox, Gerreyn) Iâd stick with Gerreyn.
Has height, athleticism and a knack for kicking goals when played in position. If he gets delisted after weâve wasted over a year of his development in defence, iâll be a little peeved. Locked onto him as my Voss replacement early.
What are our options for using our two additional rookie spots? Who of our potential pickups (if any) could go to those spots, or can anyone unsigned or signed be shifted to a rookie spot?
I genuinely wonder if weâre seriously seeing Blake Justice slide through to the rookie draft
I doubt it.
If Huss couldnât make it last year, I donât see clubs letting us get a freebie in Justice.
Does anyone know if you can add NGA prospects that werenât taken in the ND directly to the rookie list, or is it only Cat B?
I guess it could explain our reluctance to sign Nguyen as of yet.
If we donât have both on our list in some way next year, weâve â â â â â â up.
I suspect you can (AFL has stopped making their rules PDF public so I canât check), but it doesnât really matter. You can take additional cat Bâs and they just get taken out of the maximum cat A rookie numbers.
Cheers. I remain baffled regarding what weâre doing with Nguyen then.
Not everything gets announced immediately after the season ends.
Donât see any reason we wouldnât re-sign him for 1 more year as cat B.
If Justice doesnât attract a bid before 36, we can auto select with our next pick in the draft. Points no longer come into consideration when bid on.
Thanks for stating the obvious.
At the same time, heâs one of only 3 players yet to sign a contract, and should have been one of the easiest decisions to extend given the Cat B status.
Might be nothing, but itâs still a little concerning.
With Zachâs departure confirmed, weâre now an incredibly young and inexperienced team.
1 player > 30 years of age
| 1 | Peter Wright | 8 Sep 1996 | 30 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Kyle Langford | 1 Dec 1996 | 29 |
| 3 | Darcy Parish | 25 Jul 1997 | 29 |
| 4 | Brayden Fiorini | 22 Aug 1997 | 29 |
| 5 | Mason Redman | 26 Aug 1997 | 29 |
| 6 | Ben McKay | 24 Dec 1997 | 28 |
| 7 | Will Setterfield | 5 Feb 1998 | 28 |
| 8 | Andrew McGrath | 2 Jun 1998 | 28 |
| 9 | Jordan Ridley | 20 Oct 1998 | 27 |
| 10 | Nic Martin | 24 Dec 1999 | 26 |
1 player with > 200 games
- Andrew McGrath â 200
- Kyle Langford â 181
- Darcy Parish â 179
- Peter Wright â 170
- Mason Redman â 159
- Xavier Duursma â 128
- Brayden Fiorini â 125
- Archie Perkins â 117
- Sam Durham â 111
- Jordan Ridley â 111
You can see why the club is targeting the âmissing middleâ; 25â28 year old, 100â150 game players.
Iâm getting tired of this young and inexperienced rubbish.
We have plenty of senior bodies, unfortunately they are just average footballers. We do not need more of the same.
Build through the draft. 3 of them made top 10 in the Crichton this year, and the experienced guy we brought in didnât do jackshit for our infield performance. Rosa has been good drafting to date, letâs see give him a shot at replicating that.
Doesnât make a huge difference to the point, but there are a few errors and omissions there. The 26+ bracket is missing Caldwell, Duursma, Blakiston, (and Edwards, uncontracted). The 100+ games is missing Caldwell. Martinâs 25, not 26 (01 not 99). The 25 bracket also includes Jones and Prior (and Bryan in a couple of weeks).
Given we may have 6 rookies already, we may be able to use them for senior spots. It depends on:
- exactly what rules attach to the additional rookie slots
- Whether when we re-signed May and Blackiston if we kept them on the rookie list for 2028 (their third years).
So say Justice gets bid on at 37, we can match with 60?
So what I stated was obvious.
Yet you are baffled and concerned.
Right. Gotta spend them panic dollars somewhere I guess.
ive seen some amateur rookie draft watchers have Blake ranked as low as 49, thats pretty damn close to rookie listing. Itâd be another stroke of luck for Blake to get through (I dont think it will but its not out of the realms of possibility)
Correct, if that is our next available pick ![]()
Never trust AI.
