With all the delistings and retirements we have quite a few numbers up for grabs in the teen’s.
Do we think anyone wants an upgrade on their current number?
Available
1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19.
1: Langford
14: Dea
15: Pick 1
16: Ambrose
17: Last pick
19: Keep vacant for Gach
Give him a high number and then Stantons #5 or Watsons #4 when they retire.
Just give him #1 and be done with it.
Give him a high number and then Stantons #5 or Watsons #4 when they retire.Reckon he'll get #4 with the Wanganeen comparisons being made
31 is still available.
Reserved for Mason Fletcher in a couple of years, one would hope…
I reckon Dea has to get 1 if possible - displays the characteristics of numerous past players in the number.
Assuming he is there, Kelly could have any of 14, 16, 17 or 19. The other who could rightfully have one of these is Hartley.
Agree that one of Lav/Lang if not both could be promoted to a higher, although I like the idea of Lang in 4 that so many have spoken about. Who knows, it still might be free yet.
Also no certainty on 15 being free yet either so hold that thought.
Yeah I love the idea of Langford in 4 - looks right doesn’t it?
Conor Mckenna could get 17… I can see that
Should’ve added Conor actually…can absolutely see that
I’d like to see Kelly continue in the number 47.
Since when was 15 available?
Since when was 15 available?
Should really delete that from the OP.
Is it just me or does this seem a bit too soon, Shred’s jumper is still warm and you are ripping it of Courtney’s back while he is still wearing it.
I agree, Ambrose has had 29 for way too long!
How do I edit?
In any case - I don’t think Courtenay will get another contract… apologies for putting his number there.
Conor Mckenna could get 17… I can see that
His career has been so promising so far, why do you want to ruin it with the doomed number?
Conor Mckenna could get 17… I can see that
His career has been so promising so far, why do you want to ruin it with the doomed number?
next you’ll tell me peeto has joined the bandwagon.
Judd Lalich though?Conor Mckenna could get 17… I can see that
His career has been so promising so far, why do you want to ruin it with the doomed number?
Yeah I love the idea of Langford in 4 - looks right doesn't it?Conor Mckenna could get 17… I can see that
No, actually, Langford in 4 doesn’t look right. It still belongs to someone else, so don’t start giving it away. (What’s wrong with 30, by the way?)
Also, unless McKenna gets an upgrade, why would you change a rookie’s number?
I thought Ambrose already wears 16
Langford in 4 and laverde in 5 when possible
Langford in 4 and laverde in 5 when possible
WHAT IS WRONG WITH 30 and 33??