Numberssss


#1

In keeping tradition alive…NUMBERSSS!

Current vacancies
#4
#5
#24
#25
#31 (who forgot?)
#35
#39
#40
#42


#2

#Stringer5


#3

No ‘5’ or ‘4’ upgrade till things settle, imo.


#4

But Rory Sloane is worthy of 4 or 5.


#5

Stringer - 4
McKenna - 5
Smith - 20
Saad - 35


#7

#5tringer


#8

I posted last week I’m also a fan of McKenna getting the #5, back him in.

Move Parish to #4 and give Dev or Stringer #3, #10 to Dev obviously if Francis jettisons.


#9

Why would you go from 3 to 4?


#10

Saad to keep 42


#11

All-Australian2

Looks better on him.


#12

Can we leave the 4 and the 5 out of any discussion…

Let someone earn it…


#13

Conor 4
Stringer 5
Smith 20
Saad 42

Not that it matters much, just a thought


#14

Stringer 5


#15

Saad, Stringer, Smith, Stewart all to just have the letter S instead of a number


#16

No ones picked it up on the thread title :frowning:


#17

It’s too early for this obviously but for the heck of it:

I reckon Jerrett (20), Bird (24) and Howlett (40) are gone. Based on that:

Stringer - #5 - he is the type of game breaker that belongs in the #5. Sends him the strong message that we are backing him in to be a star of the club despite the circumstances surrounding his entry. And, just quietly, I reckon Jim would love it.

Smith - #20 - just 'cos. It’s round like his old number.

Saad - #24 - always reminds me of Smokin’ Joe this number and I can already imagine Saad smoking a lot of opponents this year. It’s also a deserved upgrade on his old number (and the inverse of it, for what it is worth).

Leave #4 perhaps for next year’s first pick. Leave #31 for Fletch junior.


#18

4- McKenna
5- Heppell


#19

3 = ■■■■ Reynold’s number. Why would anyone want to lose the proudest number in our history?


#20

Who wants 44 when Mckernan departs?


#21

I was thinking scott gumbleton tbh